What is the coefficient of x^3 in the taylor series (around x=0) of: ln(x+1)/ln(x-1) I know that ln(x+1) ~ x-(x^2)/2-(x^3)/3 any way to do this without headaches?
without headaches? prolly not. sadistic math teachers are just mean
product rule tends to be a nicer fit than quotient rule, but still takes time ln(a) [ln(b)]^-1
this question is from a test :( [multi choices].. I guess there is an easier way instead of deriving this 3 times..
0: ln(a) [ln(b)]^-1 1: a'/a [ln(b)]^-1 - ln(a) [ln(b)]^-2 b'/b 2: .... maybe, but 3 times deriving seems to take a shorter time to me than waiting for someone else to do it :)
1: a' a^-1 [ln(b)]^-1 - ln(a) [ln(b)]^-2 b'b b^-1 2: a'' a^-1 [ln(b)]^-1 - a'a' a^-2 [ln(b)]^-1 - a' a^-1 [ln(b)]^-2 b'/b - a'/a [ln(b)]^-2 b' b b^-1 - ln(a) [ln(b)]^-2 b'' b b^-1 - ln(a) [ln(b)]^-2 b'b' b^-1 + ln(a) [ln(b)]^-2 b'b' b b^-2 +2 ln(a) [ln(b)]^-3 b' b b^-1 b' b^-1 that might reduce lol ... but yeah, prolyy an easier way
if we know the taylors for top and bottom, we could just divide them out right?
that's what i'm thinking of.. the top is a known taylor expansion. the bottom is minus the first? I have no idea about the ln(x-1)..
not sure what michael is doing, maybe using your post to practice latex?
i have reported him >.< bah
wolfram says the coefficient is 5/12 .. I hate math teachers. They are mean :'(
ln(x-1) derives to: 1/(x-1) .. -1 -x -x^2 .... -------------------- -1+x ) 1 - (1-x) ------ x -(x-x^2) -------- x^2 integrated to: -x -x^2/2 -x^3/3 ..... would be the taylor for the bottom i believe
x -x^2/2 +x^3/3 -x^4/4 ... ------------------------ -x -x^2/2 -x^3/3 -x^4/4... i first notice that we can factor out an x .... 1 -x/2 +x^2/3 -x^3/4 ... ------------------------ -1 -x/2 -x^2/3 -x^3/4... then work some longhand till you get to the x^3 ?
-1 +x - ------------------------- -1 -x/2 -x^2/3 -x^3/4... | 1 -x/2 +x^2/3 -x^3/4 ... -1 -x/2 -x^2/3 -x^3/4... ------------------------- -x +0 -x^3/2 x +x^2/2 +x^3/3 +x^4/4 -------------------------- x^2/2 ....
http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=%281+-x%2F2+%2Bx%5E2%2F3+-x%5E3%2F4%29%2F%28-1+-x%2F2+-x%5E2%2F3+-x%5E3%2F4%29 well, that does work out .... notice on the series expansion we get the 5/12
is it easier? dunno, maybe on paper
Ahh.. stupid question. Thanks a lot mate! :)
good luck :)
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!