The formula for final velocity of an object starting from zero and undergoing constant acceleration is v = 1/2at^2. what type of variation does this represent?
If the velocity is a function of t^2, then the acceleration is NOT constant. The correct equation is V = at , V = at 50 = a(5) a = 10 m/sec^2
perhaps that is supposed to be displacement, not velocity, in which case the formula is correct
in any case, in the formula given, v varies directly with t^2
direct variation of thing 1 and thing 2 can be written thing 1 = thing 2 * constant
I probably should have proof read this. Fixed-- V = 1/2 (AT) ^2. Options to choose from: *Inverse Variation *Direct Variation *Combined Variation *Joint Variation
Sure it isn't \[V = \frac{1}{2}at^2\]?
\(V\) varies directly with \(t^2\) in my formula. \(\frac{1}{2}a\) is the constant of variation.
2v/a = t^2 t = sqrt(2v/a)
So it would be direct variation?
The formula is incorrect. The kinematics equation for constant acceleration in this case would be:\[\bf \Delta x=v_0t+\frac{1}{2}at^2\]Since the object starts from rest, \(\bf v_0=0\), the equation becomes:\[\bf \Delta x = \frac{1}{2}at^2\]There is no "velocity" involved in this equation and like @sadaholic19 stated, if \(\bf v = \frac{1}{2}at^2\) then acceleration is not constant which contradicts the question.
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!