64=(1/8)-2
Not true. o.o
no no I'm trying to write it in Logarithmic form
Err, did you write the problem correctly? There is no carat '^' in your problem anywhere. Logarithms work with exponents.
Oh, now I see it: \[64 = (\frac{1}{8})^{-2}\]
yes I was going to retype it
Check this out: \[b = x^{a} ---> \log _{x} b = a\]
Logarithms give us the EXPONENT of a problem. There fore, if we only had the numbers 64 and (1/8), we could find the -2.
For example, I'll give you this logarithm: \[\log _{10}100 = ?\]
This is saying, 10 to what power gives you the answer of 100. Do you know what the power would be?
10
Well, 10*10 = 100, how can you write it as an exponent? 10^? = 100
The exponent is kinda like how many 10's did you need to get to 100. ...
Since 10*10 = 100, we needed two 10's multiplied by each other to get to 100, right? So, we can rewrite it like \[10^{2} = 100\]
oh
Therefore, \[\log _{10}100 = 2\]
Ask yourself, how many '10s' do I need to multiply to get to 100.
ok
Maybe @AccessDenied can explain it better...I'm useless.
no you're not useless it's making sense sorry
So, do you have an idea on the main problem so far? \(64 = \left( \dfrac{1}{8} \right)^{-2} \)
Comparing it with other examples may reinforce where these problems tend to go: \( 100 = (10)^2 \qquad \to \qquad \log_{10} 100 = 2 \) \( 64 = \left( \dfrac{1}{8} \right) ^{-2} \quad \ \to \)
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!