Integral calculus challenge
For a > b > 0, evaluate the integral: \[\large{\int_{0}^{\infty} \cfrac{e^{ax} - e^{bx}}{x(e^{ax}+1)(e^{bx}+1)}dx}\]
I would post the complete solution tomorrow :) For a hint PM me :)
@ganeshie8 @Kainui
@Mimi_x3 is already here :)
@Mimi_x3 This user only accepts messages from people they have fanned. ;)
I can't reply you :)
Ooooh this is m what I'm looking for.
:)
@Mimi_x3 Sent please check if \(\large{\LaTeX}\) is working for you
I repeat- If anyone wants a hint please message me :)
+-1 in num, separate them 0, substitute x=1/t then use by parts
Looks changing it to double integral is simplifying somewhat \[\large{\int_{0}^{\infty} \cfrac{e^{ax} - e^{bx}}{x(e^{ax}+1)(e^{bx}+1)}dx} = \int \limits_0^{\infty} \int \limits _b^a \left(\dfrac{e^{tx}}{x(e^{tx}+1)}\right)'dt~dx\] \[\large = \int \limits_0^{\infty} \int \limits _b^a \dfrac{e^{tx}}{(e^{tx}+1)^2} dt~dx\] since the bounds are constants, we can change the order of integration : \[\large = \int \limits _b^a\int \limits_0^{\infty} \dfrac{e^{tx}}{(e^{tx}+1)^2} dx~dt\] \[\large = \int \limits _b^a \dfrac{-1}{2t}~dt\] \[\large = \dfrac{1}{2}\ln (a/b)\]
Correct !! Good work @ganeshie8 :D
That's really cool @ganeshie8 awesome!!!! Wow!
:) more pretty ideas : http://math.stackexchange.com/questions/590774/improper-integral-of-int-0-infty-frace-ax-e-bxx-dx
For a suitable constant C, set \[\large{f(x) = \cfrac{e^x}{e^x+1} + c}\] and show that for t > 0: \[\large{\int_{0}^{t}\cfrac{(e^{ax}-e^{bx})}{x(e^{ax}+1)(e^{bx}+1)}dx = \int_{0}^{t}\cfrac{f(ax)}{x}dx - \int_{0}^{t}\cfrac{f(bx)}{x}dx}\] This was the hint and thus I followed this idea :)
i don't remember much of laplace transforms, but im sure it would be much simpler to use below method for our problem also : http://math.stackexchange.com/questions/294383/evaluate-int-0-infty-left-fracx-textex-texte-x/295326#295326
Good idea though I too haven't read Laplace transformations
I will post my solution tomorrow... feeling too lazy today :P ;)
Interesting, I'm still sort of wondering how you could see how to turn it into a double integral like this in other problems, it doesn't feel very obvious to me yet.
it is by no means obvious lol, i had to delete my reply 20 times while cooking up the first line :P >>> ``` vishweshshrimali5 Did you reply to the calculus challenge ? Notification says yes but I can't find any... Is this a problem from my side ? ```
I guess my best sort of "analytic" approach to this is to just write it as being two identical fractions where I eliminate all the other parts that don't contain the variable like this:\[\Large \frac{e^{ax}}{x(e^{ax}+1)}-\frac{e^{bx}}{x(e^{bx}+1)}\] Then from there just sort of multiply it back together and hope it works. Although I suppose this is more of a problem of dealing with fractions and not entirely calculus.
nice :) this looks more plausible xD
@ganeshie8 You method is cool..I can't imagine that you have done it so neat. But I don't understand \[\large{\int_{0}^{\infty} \cfrac{e^{ax} - e^{bx}}{x(e^{ax}+1)(e^{bx}+1)}dx} = \int \limits_0^{\infty} \int \limits _b^a \left(\dfrac{e^{tx}}{x(e^{tx}+1)}\right)'dt~dx \] Should it not be \[ \large{\int_{0}^{\infty} \cfrac{e^{ax} - e^{bx}}{x(e^{ax}+1)(e^{bx}+1)}dx} = \int \limits_0^{\infty} \int \limits _b^a \left(\dfrac{-1}{x(e^{tx}+1)}\right)'dt~dx \] ? Am I getting it wrong?
can i use complex ?
@ShailKumar This is wrong, although you could reverse your limits of integration to be correct. It feels odd to do f(a)-f(b) instead of f(b)-f(a) for some reason to me at least, so this might be where your mistake is.
Oh was there something wrong? to me both looks fine still... in my expression also, numerator simplifies to `e^ax-e^bx` after taking bounds for the expression inside derivative \[ \large \int \limits _b^a \left(\dfrac{e^{tx}}{x(e^{tx}+1)}\right)'dt = \dfrac{e^{tx}}{x(e^{tx}+1)} \Bigg|_b^a = \cfrac{e^{ax} - e^{bx}}{x(e^{ax}+1)(e^{bx}+1)} \] my expression is bit loose, i see it >.<
@ganeshie8 Oh.. I get it now..Thanks
@Kainui Can you be more explicit as I don't understand your point..? :(
My point is that what you had written had a negative sign, so you could fix it by changing your bounds of integration because: \[\LARGE \int\limits_a^b f(x)dx = \int\limits _b^a -f(x)dx\]
@Kainui When I am integrating from 2 to 1 ?
You're not? I haven't said anything about 2 or 1?
For any constant C, the function \[\large{f(x) = \cfrac{e^x}{e^x + 1} + c,~~ x\ge 0,}\] is such that \[\large{f(ax) - f(bx) = \cfrac{e^{ax}-e^{bx}}{(e^{ax}+1)(e^{bx}+1)}}\] For t > 0 we have: \[\large{I(t) = \int_{0}^{t}\cfrac{e^{ax}-e^{bx}}{x(e^{ax}+1)(e^{bx}+1)}dx}\] \[\large{=\int_{0}^{t}\cfrac{f(ax)-f(bx)}{x}dx}\] \[\large{=\int_{0}^{t}\cfrac{f(ax)}{x}dx-\int_{0}^{t}\cfrac{f(bx)}{x}dx}\] Of course, provided both the latter integrals exist. Now this is true if \(\large{\lim_{y \rightarrow 0} \cfrac{f(y)}{y}}\) exists, which is true iff \(\large{C = -\cfrac{1}{2}}\). Assuming that this is true, we have : \[\large{I(t) = \int_{0}^{at}\cfrac{f(y)}{y}dy - \int_{0}^{bt}\cfrac{f(y)}{y}dy}\] \[\large{=\int_{at}^{bt}\cfrac{f(y)}{y}dy}\] Now since \(\large{\lim_{x\rightarrow \infty} f(x) = \cfrac{1}{2}}\) so this means that given any \(\large{\epsilon >0}\) there exists a positive real number \(\large{x_{0} = x_{0}(\epsilon)}\)such that \[\large{x > x_{0}~\implies \cfrac{1}{2} - \epsilon < f(x) < \cfrac{1}{2} + \epsilon}\] If \(\large{t > \cfrac{x_{0}}{b}}\), then \(\large{at > bt > x_{0}}\), and so we have: \[\large{(\cfrac{1}{2} - \epsilon)\ln{\cfrac{a}{b}} = \int_{at}^{bt}\cfrac{(\cfrac{1}{2}-\epsilon)}{y}dy}\] \[\large{< I(t)}\] \[\large{< \int_{at}^{bt}\cfrac{(\cfrac{1}{2}+\epsilon)}{y}dy}\] \[\large{= (\cfrac{1}{2}+\epsilon)\ln{\cfrac{a}{b}}}\] Since, \(\large{\epsilon}\) is arbitrary, thus: \[\large{\lim_{t\rightarrow \infty} I(t) = \cfrac{1}{2}\ln{\cfrac{a}{b}}}\] Thus, \[\large{\int_{0}^{\infty}\cfrac{e^{ax}-e^{bx}}{x(e^{ax}+1)(e^{bx}+1)}dx = \cfrac{1}{2}\ln{\cfrac{a}{b}}}\]
@ganeshie8 @Kainui
This was my solution ^^^^
cool ^
:) Thanks
I like it, just takes a while to read haha. Very awesome, I'm always looking for new tricks to solve integrals, they are one of my favorite things to play with. Thanks! @vishweshshrimali5
Your welcome :) I too learn new tricks daily thanks to @ganeshie8 and you ;) :D
Awesome @vishweshshrimali5
Thanks @iambatman :)
I started reading this thinking it was new and thought, "Hey, this looks familiar." haha
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!