Ask your own question, for FREE!
Mathematics 20 Online
OpenStudy (vishweshshrimali5):

Integral calculus challenge

OpenStudy (vishweshshrimali5):

For a > b > 0, evaluate the integral: \[\large{\int_{0}^{\infty} \cfrac{e^{ax} - e^{bx}}{x(e^{ax}+1)(e^{bx}+1)}dx}\]

OpenStudy (vishweshshrimali5):

I would post the complete solution tomorrow :) For a hint PM me :)

OpenStudy (vishweshshrimali5):

@ganeshie8 @Kainui

OpenStudy (vishweshshrimali5):

@Mimi_x3 is already here :)

OpenStudy (vishweshshrimali5):

@Mimi_x3 This user only accepts messages from people they have fanned. ;)

OpenStudy (vishweshshrimali5):

I can't reply you :)

OpenStudy (kainui):

Ooooh this is m what I'm looking for.

OpenStudy (vishweshshrimali5):

:)

OpenStudy (vishweshshrimali5):

@Mimi_x3 Sent please check if \(\large{\LaTeX}\) is working for you

OpenStudy (vishweshshrimali5):

I repeat- If anyone wants a hint please message me :)

OpenStudy (anonymous):

+-1 in num, separate them 0, substitute x=1/t then use by parts

ganeshie8 (ganeshie8):

Looks changing it to double integral is simplifying somewhat \[\large{\int_{0}^{\infty} \cfrac{e^{ax} - e^{bx}}{x(e^{ax}+1)(e^{bx}+1)}dx} = \int \limits_0^{\infty} \int \limits _b^a \left(\dfrac{e^{tx}}{x(e^{tx}+1)}\right)'dt~dx\] \[\large = \int \limits_0^{\infty} \int \limits _b^a \dfrac{e^{tx}}{(e^{tx}+1)^2} dt~dx\] since the bounds are constants, we can change the order of integration : \[\large = \int \limits _b^a\int \limits_0^{\infty} \dfrac{e^{tx}}{(e^{tx}+1)^2} dx~dt\] \[\large = \int \limits _b^a \dfrac{-1}{2t}~dt\] \[\large = \dfrac{1}{2}\ln (a/b)\]

OpenStudy (vishweshshrimali5):

Correct !! Good work @ganeshie8 :D

OpenStudy (kainui):

That's really cool @ganeshie8 awesome!!!! Wow!

OpenStudy (vishweshshrimali5):

For a suitable constant C, set \[\large{f(x) = \cfrac{e^x}{e^x+1} + c}\] and show that for t > 0: \[\large{\int_{0}^{t}\cfrac{(e^{ax}-e^{bx})}{x(e^{ax}+1)(e^{bx}+1)}dx = \int_{0}^{t}\cfrac{f(ax)}{x}dx - \int_{0}^{t}\cfrac{f(bx)}{x}dx}\] This was the hint and thus I followed this idea :)

ganeshie8 (ganeshie8):

i don't remember much of laplace transforms, but im sure it would be much simpler to use below method for our problem also : http://math.stackexchange.com/questions/294383/evaluate-int-0-infty-left-fracx-textex-texte-x/295326#295326

OpenStudy (vishweshshrimali5):

Good idea though I too haven't read Laplace transformations

OpenStudy (vishweshshrimali5):

I will post my solution tomorrow... feeling too lazy today :P ;)

OpenStudy (kainui):

Interesting, I'm still sort of wondering how you could see how to turn it into a double integral like this in other problems, it doesn't feel very obvious to me yet.

ganeshie8 (ganeshie8):

it is by no means obvious lol, i had to delete my reply 20 times while cooking up the first line :P >>> ``` vishweshshrimali5 Did you reply to the calculus challenge ? Notification says yes but I can't find any... Is this a problem from my side ? ```

OpenStudy (kainui):

I guess my best sort of "analytic" approach to this is to just write it as being two identical fractions where I eliminate all the other parts that don't contain the variable like this:\[\Large \frac{e^{ax}}{x(e^{ax}+1)}-\frac{e^{bx}}{x(e^{bx}+1)}\] Then from there just sort of multiply it back together and hope it works. Although I suppose this is more of a problem of dealing with fractions and not entirely calculus.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

ganeshie8 (ganeshie8):

nice :) this looks more plausible xD

OpenStudy (anonymous):

@ganeshie8 You method is cool..I can't imagine that you have done it so neat. But I don't understand \[\large{\int_{0}^{\infty} \cfrac{e^{ax} - e^{bx}}{x(e^{ax}+1)(e^{bx}+1)}dx} = \int \limits_0^{\infty} \int \limits _b^a \left(\dfrac{e^{tx}}{x(e^{tx}+1)}\right)'dt~dx \] Should it not be \[ \large{\int_{0}^{\infty} \cfrac{e^{ax} - e^{bx}}{x(e^{ax}+1)(e^{bx}+1)}dx} = \int \limits_0^{\infty} \int \limits _b^a \left(\dfrac{-1}{x(e^{tx}+1)}\right)'dt~dx \] ? Am I getting it wrong?

OpenStudy (ikram002p):

can i use complex ?

OpenStudy (kainui):

@ShailKumar This is wrong, although you could reverse your limits of integration to be correct. It feels odd to do f(a)-f(b) instead of f(b)-f(a) for some reason to me at least, so this might be where your mistake is.

ganeshie8 (ganeshie8):

Oh was there something wrong? to me both looks fine still... in my expression also, numerator simplifies to `e^ax-e^bx` after taking bounds for the expression inside derivative \[ \large \int \limits _b^a \left(\dfrac{e^{tx}}{x(e^{tx}+1)}\right)'dt = \dfrac{e^{tx}}{x(e^{tx}+1)} \Bigg|_b^a = \cfrac{e^{ax} - e^{bx}}{x(e^{ax}+1)(e^{bx}+1)} \] my expression is bit loose, i see it >.<

OpenStudy (anonymous):

@ganeshie8 Oh.. I get it now..Thanks

OpenStudy (anonymous):

@Kainui Can you be more explicit as I don't understand your point..? :(

OpenStudy (kainui):

My point is that what you had written had a negative sign, so you could fix it by changing your bounds of integration because: \[\LARGE \int\limits_a^b f(x)dx = \int\limits _b^a -f(x)dx\]

OpenStudy (anonymous):

@Kainui When I am integrating from 2 to 1 ?

OpenStudy (kainui):

You're not? I haven't said anything about 2 or 1?

OpenStudy (vishweshshrimali5):

For any constant C, the function \[\large{f(x) = \cfrac{e^x}{e^x + 1} + c,~~ x\ge 0,}\] is such that \[\large{f(ax) - f(bx) = \cfrac{e^{ax}-e^{bx}}{(e^{ax}+1)(e^{bx}+1)}}\] For t > 0 we have: \[\large{I(t) = \int_{0}^{t}\cfrac{e^{ax}-e^{bx}}{x(e^{ax}+1)(e^{bx}+1)}dx}\] \[\large{=\int_{0}^{t}\cfrac{f(ax)-f(bx)}{x}dx}\] \[\large{=\int_{0}^{t}\cfrac{f(ax)}{x}dx-\int_{0}^{t}\cfrac{f(bx)}{x}dx}\] Of course, provided both the latter integrals exist. Now this is true if \(\large{\lim_{y \rightarrow 0} \cfrac{f(y)}{y}}\) exists, which is true iff \(\large{C = -\cfrac{1}{2}}\). Assuming that this is true, we have : \[\large{I(t) = \int_{0}^{at}\cfrac{f(y)}{y}dy - \int_{0}^{bt}\cfrac{f(y)}{y}dy}\] \[\large{=\int_{at}^{bt}\cfrac{f(y)}{y}dy}\] Now since \(\large{\lim_{x\rightarrow \infty} f(x) = \cfrac{1}{2}}\) so this means that given any \(\large{\epsilon >0}\) there exists a positive real number \(\large{x_{0} = x_{0}(\epsilon)}\)such that \[\large{x > x_{0}~\implies \cfrac{1}{2} - \epsilon < f(x) < \cfrac{1}{2} + \epsilon}\] If \(\large{t > \cfrac{x_{0}}{b}}\), then \(\large{at > bt > x_{0}}\), and so we have: \[\large{(\cfrac{1}{2} - \epsilon)\ln{\cfrac{a}{b}} = \int_{at}^{bt}\cfrac{(\cfrac{1}{2}-\epsilon)}{y}dy}\] \[\large{< I(t)}\] \[\large{< \int_{at}^{bt}\cfrac{(\cfrac{1}{2}+\epsilon)}{y}dy}\] \[\large{= (\cfrac{1}{2}+\epsilon)\ln{\cfrac{a}{b}}}\] Since, \(\large{\epsilon}\) is arbitrary, thus: \[\large{\lim_{t\rightarrow \infty} I(t) = \cfrac{1}{2}\ln{\cfrac{a}{b}}}\] Thus, \[\large{\int_{0}^{\infty}\cfrac{e^{ax}-e^{bx}}{x(e^{ax}+1)(e^{bx}+1)}dx = \cfrac{1}{2}\ln{\cfrac{a}{b}}}\]

OpenStudy (vishweshshrimali5):

@ganeshie8 @Kainui

OpenStudy (vishweshshrimali5):

This was my solution ^^^^

OpenStudy (ikram002p):

cool ^

OpenStudy (vishweshshrimali5):

:) Thanks

OpenStudy (kainui):

I like it, just takes a while to read haha. Very awesome, I'm always looking for new tricks to solve integrals, they are one of my favorite things to play with. Thanks! @vishweshshrimali5

OpenStudy (vishweshshrimali5):

Your welcome :) I too learn new tricks daily thanks to @ganeshie8 and you ;) :D

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Awesome @vishweshshrimali5

OpenStudy (vishweshshrimali5):

Thanks @iambatman :)

OpenStudy (kainui):

I started reading this thinking it was new and thought, "Hey, this looks familiar." haha

Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!
Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!