Natalie wants to invest $40,000 in mutual funds. If she invests $30,000 or more in the NovelOptions family of funds, she pays no load. However, she does not want all her savings dependent on one company, so she puts $20,000 in NovelOptions funds and $20,000 in EdStars funds. How is Natalie's decision best described?
She is accepting costs that will reduce her returns for the security of more diversification. She is hoping for higher returns but at the risk of having a less diversified portfolio. She and her broker are probably committing a breakpoint violation. She has diversification of security types but not of sectors or regions.
@JoannaBlackwelder
I think it is A. She knows she will have to pay more but is willing to because she wants to diversify more.
i thought its C
well it could be/
I don't think it is a breakpoint violation, because she is wanting to out 10,000 less than the breakpoint into the fund and I wouldn't call that just below the breakpoint.
nvm its A
She is also voluntarily choosing it.
theres 3 choices with disdiversified
Ok. :)
It's not be because she is not hoping for higher returns. She is taking less.
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!