Justification of the existence of a vertical asymptote using limits.
For the function below, find any vertical asymptote(s) that exist. Justify your answer(s) using a limit(s).\[h(x)=\frac{ 2x^2+7x+3 }{ x^2+2x-3 }\]
so am I taking the limit of h(x) as x approaches 1 since x=1 is the vertical asymptote?
@phi
the vertical asymptotes occur when the bottom is 0 (divide by 0 causes them)
true but I don't understand what the instructions are telling me. I am not allowed to use the graph to find this limit, I have to find the limit using the vertical asymptote....
when I factor the top and bottom (x+3) cancels out so that means that x=3 is not a vertical asymptote, it is a hole in the graph
ok. The last step is find the limit of h(x) as x->1
can't because I have a zero on the bottom, so does that mean I pick numbers to the right and left of 1
you will approach -inf on one side and + inf on the other side.
yes but how do I prove that analytically
I suppose we can use the definition https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/(ε,_δ)-definition_of_limit
no we don't use that on AP calculus exams
mathematically yes you are correct, if this was a question from a calculus professor but its not, it is from ap calculus
as x->1+ (from the right side) the top approaches 12 and the bottom approaches 0 and the quotient approaches + infinity (or does not exist) that is the best I can do on this one.
similarly as x-> 1- the function approaches -infinity
another good reason to just delete it altogether. It does not make any sense to me..... Thanks :)
can you post a few pages or a link ? (I am curious about this)
Here you go
@phi
thanks. But that is too sketchy to figure out what they are thinking.
thanks, I am glad to see that I was not the only one who felt that way
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!