Ask your own question, for FREE!
Mathematics 8 Online
OpenStudy (loser66):

Suppose that p>1 has the property that for all integers a, b, if p divides the product ab, then p divides a or p divides b. Show that p is a prime. Please, help

OpenStudy (loser66):

@rational

OpenStudy (rational):

Suppose \(p = d_1*d_2\) is composite with the given property. Next consider two integers \(a=d_1\) and \(b=d_2\), clearly \(\large p\) divides \(\large a*b\) However \(\large p\) cannot divide \(\large a\) or \(\large b\) individually because \(\large p \gt a\) and \(\large p \gt b\) So \(\large p\) is not composite.

OpenStudy (loser66):

Is it so particular?? How about the case like 6 | 72 where a =36 and b =2, but 6 is not a prime.

OpenStudy (loser66):

@rational

OpenStudy (rational):

The proof is about proving that the given property will not hold for a composite number like, 6.

OpenStudy (loser66):

:) , let me think more, still not digest it.

OpenStudy (rational):

The given property states below : Suppose that p>1 has the property that `for all integers a, b,` if p divides the product ab, then p divides a or p divides b.

OpenStudy (rational):

what we have shown in the proof above is that, there will be some integers `a,b` for which the given property will not hold for composite numbers, like 6

OpenStudy (loser66):

Oh, yes, got it so far.

OpenStudy (rational):

for example : 6|3*2 but 6 does not divide 3 6 does not divide 2 failing the given property

OpenStudy (rational):

I can show that every composite number fails the given property using above trick ^^

OpenStudy (loser66):

hihihi. thank you.

Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!
Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!