The rigid beam, AB, has a weight of 1.05 kN hanging vertically at point B. The beam weighs 1.20 kN and is supported by a hinge at point A and a cable at point B. Determine the tension in the cable and the reaction forces on the beam at point A.
its just trig, or even simpler, congruent triangles
I am having trouble knowing where and how I should take the moment
|dw:1411353456442:dw|
I have F\[F _{y}=0=Tsin(\theta)+B _{y}-w _{1}-w _{2}\]
this should allow us to determine the tension in the cable
is your issue with the reaction forces?
and \[F _{x}=0=-Tcos(\theta)+B _{x}\]
sin(theta) is just a ratio of sides, and we know the sides already so theta is immaterial at the moment
so should I take the moment at point A?
yes
which should be the solutions to 1.5 n and 2 n
so \[M _{A}=0=-w _{1}(.75)-w _{2}(2)+2T\]
so T=1.5 kN \[B _{x}=1.2 kN\] \[B _{y}=1.35 kN\]
is that correct?
n = 1.05/1.5 such that T = 1.05 sqrt(1.5^2 + 2^2)/1.5 = 1.75 is what im getting
chk that im not violating any dimension rules of course
the meters cancel and we are left with kN
the forces at A are simply 1.5n and 2n given that n=1.05/1.5 seems fair to me
I don't understand where you are getting this n from?
you do understand that sin(theta) = y/r = 1.5/sqrt(1.5^2 + 2^2)
yes
|dw:1411355026658:dw| we are given this as the dimensions for our right triangle, the same right triangle will be sclaed such that 1.5 times some value is equal to 1.05 as given
but that 1.05 is a force, not a length?
doesnt matter, the angles are the same and therefore the similar triangles all have the same ratios
but are you forgetting about the weight of the beam?
let n = 1.05 kN/ 1.5 m therefore: 1.5 m * 1.05 kN/1.5 m = 1.05 kN
you may be right .... does the information given tell us that 1.05 is a result of the beams weight?
no, the weight of 1.05 kN hangs vertically from point B and the beam weighs 1.20. I don't think the 1.05 is part of the beam.
then my idea is prolly flawed since i was assuming the 1.05 was an effect given by the beams weight being in that position to start with
now that i have doubts raised, thanks lol, im not sure that i can proceed with a solution process. math is more natural to me than physics per se
ratio the beams weight, and then add in the vertical?
so you don't think the way I solved it will work?
im not familiar with your formulas so i cant say for sure
well it's a statics problem so all the forces in the x-direction have to sum to 0, same as the forces in the y-direction
right
|dw:1411356140975:dw|
does that look like a reasonable stick model?
what force is the horizontal arrow on the far right?
well, the beam wants to fall down, the only direction it can want to move at b is down and right
its the forces that are keeping tension on the cable
from my own faulty perspective of course :)
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!