Ask
your own question, for FREE!
Discrete Math
19 Online
Prove [(p∧q) → r] → [(p→r)⋁(q→r)] is a tautology without using a truth table.
Still Need Help?
Join the QuestionCove community and study together with friends!
what other method do you use other than truth table?
I am not sure. I think we are supposed to use logical equivalences.. Demorgan laws, implication law, etc
thats why I am asking for help on here
hello?
left side:\[=\neg r \to\neg ( p \wedge q)\]\[=\neg r \to (\neg p \vee \neg q)\] right side:\[= \left( \neg r \to \neg p \right) \vee \left( \neg r \to \neg q \right)\]
Still Need Help?
Join the QuestionCove community and study together with friends!
just using implication and deMorgan
Can't find your answer?
Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!
Latest Questions
October4:
For my lover~ I Love You, I Love You I am going to tell you a tale that is one hundred percent true.
Keyla:
Does any one have tips on helping me remember the differences in the three branches.
xXAikoXx:
How do I stop hating life? ... For the past 3 years I woke up everyday finding myself just completely drained and wanting everything to be over already.
MrMystery:
I have an assignment in my Senior Seminar class about 2 sentence horror stories,
Breathless:
Maybe once I may figure out. How time stops when your around Maybe one time I can figure how you send my heart into a beating rage Maybe I will understand h
Countless7Echos:
uuhh update: pushing to another project yayyy (simplified artstyle)
33 minutes ago
2 Replies
0 Medals
23 minutes ago
1 Reply
0 Medals
7 hours ago
4 Replies
0 Medals
1 hour ago
1 Reply
0 Medals
1 hour ago
5 Replies
0 Medals
1 hour ago
6 Replies
0 Medals