Ask your own question, for FREE!
Mathematics 21 Online
OpenStudy (astrophysics):

Series

OpenStudy (astrophysics):

\[\sum_{n=1}^{\infty} \ln \left( 1+\frac{ 1 }{ n } \right)\] @ganeshie8 Is this a telescoping series? I did test for divergence got 0 which is inconclusive but it's not right.

ganeshie8 (ganeshie8):

try comparison test with harmonic series

ganeshie8 (ganeshie8):

first show that ln(1 + 1/n) > 1/n for all n > 1

OpenStudy (astrophysics):

Limit comparison right?

ganeshie8 (ganeshie8):

yes anything will do

OpenStudy (astrophysics):

So let \[a_n= \ln \left( 1+\frac{ 1 }{ n } \right)\] bn will be the inside then? or just 1/n

OpenStudy (astrophysics):

\[b_n = \frac{ 1 }{ n }\]

OpenStudy (astrophysics):

The ln function is greater than 1/n is it not

ganeshie8 (ganeshie8):

you want the known diverging series to be less, so try \(\large b_n = \dfrac{0.5}{n}\)

OpenStudy (astrophysics):

So the constant doesn't matter?

OpenStudy (astrophysics):

You can make it anything you want

ganeshie8 (ganeshie8):

multiplying a constant by a diverging series won't make it converging so it doesn't matter

OpenStudy (astrophysics):

Ah right

ganeshie8 (ganeshie8):

if a series is diverging, then so is the series multiplied by a non zero constant

ganeshie8 (ganeshie8):

or you could even compare it with ln(1/n) \[\large b_n = \ln(\frac{1}{n})\]

OpenStudy (astrophysics):

\[\lim_{n \rightarrow \infty} \frac{ a_n }{ b_n } = \frac{ \ln \left( 1+\frac{ 1 }{ n } \right) }{ \frac{ 0.5 }{ n } }\] \[= \lim_{n \rightarrow \infty} \ln \left( 1+\frac{ 1 }{ n } \right)n\] actually what if I let that be 1/n then I can just jump to the expression above.. and divide everything by n and get it to diverge? But then I'll be back to step 1 haha.

OpenStudy (astrophysics):

Yeah I think that would be better

ganeshie8 (ganeshie8):

yeah showing \(\large \ln \left(1+\frac{1}{n}\right) \gt \ln\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)\) is trivial

ganeshie8 (ganeshie8):

also since ln is strictly increasing function and since \(\large i \gt j \implies \ln(i) \gt \ln(j)\), the series \(\ln (\frac{1}{n})\) diverges too. Having said this, u can use this as \(b_n\) in your comparison test

ganeshie8 (ganeshie8):

if everything above doesn't look straightforward, you could take partial sums manually and see where the series is heading

OpenStudy (ikram002p):

if u proved ln(1+1/n) > ln ( 1/n) ( any way u would like to show ) and took 1/n as a reference which is div the comparison ends hmm

OpenStudy (ikram002p):

see why i like comparison , lol

ganeshie8 (ganeshie8):

yeah thats the reason i like comparison test

ganeshie8 (ganeshie8):

Oh same pinch !

OpenStudy (astrophysics):

So overall would this series diverge?

ganeshie8 (ganeshie8):

it has to diverge because the series with terms lesser term values diverges : \(\large \ln(1/n)\) diverges \(\implies \ln(1+1/n)\) diverges by comparison test because \(\large\ln(1+1/n) \gt \ln(1/n)\)

OpenStudy (astrophysics):

That makes sense, thanks dude!

ganeshie8 (ganeshie8):

each term in ln(1+1/n) series is greater than the corresponding term in ln(1/n) series so the series in question grows faster than the diverging series

OpenStudy (ikram002p):

keep this in ur mind if u have two series \(y_n \), \(x_n \) then comparison test is :- 1_ if \(x_n>y_n\) and \(y_n\) diverge then \( x_n \) diverge 2_ if \(x_n >y_n\) and \( x_n \) converge then \( y_n\) converge

OpenStudy (astrophysics):

Yup, I just read my notes and used it, thanks :)

OpenStudy (ikram002p):

btw , he is not a dude :P

OpenStudy (astrophysics):

but he's a he

OpenStudy (astrophysics):

This is the first time I've called him dude, sounds weird, I'll keep it professional next time.

OpenStudy (ikram002p):

lol u got scared bhahahaha just messing with u :P

OpenStudy (astrophysics):

Lol, I don't want to disrespect ganeshie :p

OpenStudy (astrophysics):

Thanks again for the help both of you :D

OpenStudy (ikram002p):

ur wlc dude xD

ganeshie8 (ganeshie8):

lol dude is not a disrespectful/weird word duede

ganeshie8 (ganeshie8):

hey you can't compare it with ln(1/n) as the terms are not positive use something else if you want it done using comparison test

OpenStudy (ikram002p):

why ?

ganeshie8 (ganeshie8):

comparison test requires terms in both series to be > 0, right ?

OpenStudy (ikram002p):

ok yess

OpenStudy (ikram002p):

oh i got it hmmm

ganeshie8 (ganeshie8):

can we use -ln(1/n) ?

OpenStudy (ikram002p):

i guess , since ln(1+1/n) >0

ganeshie8 (ganeshie8):

nvm it wont work

OpenStudy (ikram002p):

why , it would work :O

ganeshie8 (ganeshie8):

-ln(1/n) = ln(n) which grows faster than ln(1+1/n) so not useful

OpenStudy (ikram002p):

mmmm

ganeshie8 (ganeshie8):

actually his original idea was straightforward : \[\large \begin{align} \sum_{n=1}^{\infty} \ln \left( 1+\frac{ 1 }{ n } \right) &= \sum_{n=1}^{\infty} \ln \left( n+1 \right)-\ln(n) \\~\\&= \lim\limits_{k\to \infty } \ln(k+1) \\~\\&= \text{diverges}\end{align} \]

ganeshie8 (ganeshie8):

telescoping would have been sufficient :)

OpenStudy (ikram002p):

haha xD

OpenStudy (astrophysics):

@ganeshie8 Can you please show the telescoping step by step haha? I have an idea but I just want to see it.

Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!
Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!