Need help understanding the concept. Does \(\dfrac{(-1)^n}{n}\) converge or diverge?
Let \(X_n= \dfrac{(-1)^n}{n}\)
\(X_n= (-1)^n *\dfrac{1}{n}\) so that \(lim X_n =lim (-1)^n *lim 1/n = 0 \) Which shows it converges. Am I right?
One more thing, if Xn diverges , is it possible that it is bounded and have lim? for example \(X_n = (-1)^n \) it is diverge, but it is bounded by -1, and 1,
it converges for sure, but not the limit test is not useful. you have used alternating series test, right ?
A series that doesn't have a limit it converges, so yeah it's possible for it to be bounded.
Diverges*
I don't use test to know whether it converges or not, because it is trivial that lim =0 :)
sequence converges does not imply the series converges
a sequence converges --> it has a limit, right?
yes oh you're talkign about sequence.. then fine :)
looks i have misread the question as series hmm
What do you mean by "opposite"?
I though you talked about series
I meant the other way arround
@ganeshie8 I confuse between conve/diverge of sequence and series, too. But for now, it is a sequence, solve it first. I will ask for series later
you have already solved it right, whats there to solve further ?
@math&ing001 a sequence converges--> has limit a sequence diverges --> no bound --> no limit, right?
Yeah, that's right.
how about \(X_n= (-1)^n\), it diverges but bounded by -1,1
and supremum is 1, infimum is -1.
Yes that's was I was talking about earlier, it may be bounded but still diverges because it has no limit.
You see, it confuses me, earlier: diverges --> no bound--> no limit this case: diverges --> but bounded. ha??
I didn't pay attention to your post, this should be removed : a sequence converges--> has limit a sequence diverges -->(( no bound -->)) no limit
By the way, I think you're talking about series here. This is the sequence (-1)^1 , (-1)^2/2 , (-1)^3/3 , ..... This is the series (-1)^1 + (-1)^2/2 + (-1)^3/3 + .....
I know the definition of series, it just partial sum of sequence. However, all concept about series come from sequence. So that I want to make it clear before moving to the series. Obviously, the sequence (-1)^n has 2 converged subsequences (1)^n and (-1)^n where n even and odd respectively. But itself (-1)^n is diverges. And I confused about its bounds
Or: bounded sequence doesn't mean the sequence convergent. ? And it confuses me also. Ha!!
Yeah I understand the confusion, just remember this : -1<(-1)^n<1 => \[\sum_{}^{}(-1) \le \sum_{}^{}(-1)^{n} \le \sum_{}^{} 1\] and technically both those series diverge so it doesn't mean anything.
|dw:1412511930198:dw|
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!