(Algebra) I just realized that when exponentiating some value and using properties of exponents, some things come up that make no sense to me; what's the "illegal" algebra move here? (Math below)
If I have a statement like \[\frac{\alpha '}{\alpha} =\frac{2}{x}\]
If I use separation of variables, take the natural log of both sides and eventually end up with: \[\ln(\alpha)=2\ln(x)\] Upon exponentiating, I can get:\[\alpha = e^{2 \ln(x)}\]
Why, when I separate the two multiplied terms in the exponent, e.g. \[\alpha = e^2 e^{\ln(x)}=e^2 x = e^{2 \ln(x)}=e^{\ln(x^2)}=x^2\]
Why are these statements not equivalent? Because e^2x =/=x^2, obviously.
\[a^{mn}\ne a^m\cdot a^n\]
\[a^{mn} = \left(a^m\right)^n\]
Oh god, what am I thinking of? In what context is something like that similar? There's something like that, but I can't recall what. Not just e^m^n, either
Huh, well thanks, anyways! I don't know what I'm remembering, but there's some other similar property or situation I'm failing to recall.
when dealing with integers, we can think of exponentiation as a short cut for repeated multiplication \[a^m = a\cdot a\cdot a\cdot \cdots (\text{m times})\]
\[\color{blue}{a^n = a\cdot a\cdot a\cdot \cdots (\text{n times})}\]
multiplying them both gives \[a^m\bullet\color{blue}{a^n}~~=~~a^n = a\cdot a\cdot a\cdot \cdots (\text{m times})\bullet \color{blue}{a^n = a\cdot a\cdot a\cdot \cdots (\text{n times})}\] it is easy to see that \(a\) is getting multiplied \(m+\color{blue}{n}\) times on right hand side
therefore \[a^m\bullet\color{blue}{a^n}~~~=~~~a^{m+\color{blue}{n}}\]
we can try and make sense of the other rule \((a^m)^n =a^{mn}\) also with similar reasoning
** \[a^m\bullet\color{blue}{a^n}~~ =~~ a\cdot a\cdot a\cdot \cdots (\text{m times})\bullet \color{blue}{a\cdot a\cdot a\cdot \cdots (\text{n times})}\]
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!