Given a function on the xy plane. f(x,y) such that f(2,2) = 20 and \(\dfrac{\partial f}{\partial x}=3x^2+3y\) , \(\dfrac{\partial f}{\partial y}= 3x+2y\). Then f(0,0)=?? Please, help
My attempt: \(f(0,0) -f(2,2) = \triangle f = 3x^2+3y+3x+2y\) At (2,2) , \(\triangle f = 28\), hence f(0,0) = 48, But it is very wrong. hahaha.... I don't know how to fix
use approximation formula ? looks im getting \(\Delta f \approx f_x\Delta x+f_y\Delta y = (18)*(-2) + (10)*(-2) = -56\)
The options are 1) 0 2) -1 3) -2 4) -3 5) -4
\(f(0,0) =f(2,2)+\Delta f \approx 20 - 56 = -36\)
Another thought: \(\dfrac{\partial f}{\partial x}=3x^2 +3y\\f(x,y)= x^3+3xy+h(y)\\\dfrac{\partial f}{\partial y}= 3x+h'(y) = 3x+2y\\h'(y) = 2y\\h(y) =y^2+C\) Hence \(f(x,y) = x^3+3xy +y^2+C \\f(2,2) = 2^3+3*2*2+2^2+C=20\\C= -4\) therefore \(f(x,y) = x^3+3xy+y^2-4\\f(0,0) =-4\)
Interesting, so that's like finding the potential function haha.
Yes, because from approximating method, I don't know how to check whether my logic is right or wrong.
Yeah, that method looked weird to me
-4 looks good but I'm not sure...@ganeshie8
@ganeshie8
Thank you, let's wait for him.
-36 is correct using approximation formula -4 is correct by solving the function depends on what you want
hey, no way!!! -4 is ffffffffffffffar different from -36
Thats the reason it is called "approximation" formula
but the error is so nonsense. If it is -4 and -4.5, I am ok.
You just got lucky with the present problem because there exists a potential function, this is not the case with most functions and you will end up using approximation formula
I know!! that is why I posted the question here. hehehe...
Unfortunately, when using app. and the answer is -36, how can I check the correct choice? I don't have -36 options.
how did u get the idea of finding f(x,y) directly instead of using the approximation formula ?
I don't get what you mean by "how". I try all the ways out. I saw partial derivative and I linked it to DE. hehehe...
Hmm try this : Given a function on the xy plane. f(x,y) such that f(2,2) = 20 and \(\dfrac{\partial f}{\partial x}=3x^2+3y\) , \(\dfrac{\partial f}{\partial y}= x+2y\). Then f(0,0)=??
If you think of that as vector field, notice that the curl is nonzero. So potential function cannot exist. Let me know if you ever get successful finding \(f(x,y)\) :P
as above, f(x,y) = x^3 + 3xy + h(y) f_y = 3x + h'(y) = x+2y h'(y) = -2x+2y h(y) -2xy +y^2 +C f(x,y) =x^3+3xy-2xy+y^2 +C = x^3 +xy +y^2 +C f(2,2)= 8+4+4 +C=20 C= 4 f(x,y) = x^3+xy +y^2 +4 f(0,0) =4
f(x,y) = x^3+xy +y^2 +4 f_x = 3x^2 + y this is wrong
It turns out that we cannot find \(f(x,y)\) because there is no such function whose partials with respect to \(x\) and \(y\) are \(3x^2+3y\) and \(x+2y\) respectively
Yes, I see it. Thanks for pointing it out.
How to solve my original problem and down the answer to one of the options?? Please
My point is that question should make it clear. question seems to be asking the exact value but your initial attempt focused on finding the approximation.
you've got f(0,0) = -4 done with the original prblem right ?
YOu said that it is invalid. I am just lucky. I don't want it. I want the firm logic.
Never said it is invalid.
above : "You just got lucky with the present problem because there exists a potential function, this is not the case with most functions and you will end up using approximation formula"
\(f(x,y) = x^3+3xy+y^2-4\) does satisfy all the given conditions, so we're good!
what i meant was, you cannot solve the function always. recall the definition of exact differential equations or conservative vector fields
Ok, got you. Thank you for being patient to me. :)
It seems we can find the potential function if the mixed partials are equal : \[f_{xy} = f_{yx}\] Eventhough most functions that we encounter directly satisfy this, you can see it is easy to cook up the partials that violate above condition and thus lack solution(s).
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!