I am REALLY stuck on this one... This (I think) Definite Integral problem has me stuck at the first step, and I can usually at least get my "u" figured out... Would someone be willing to coach me through how to approach this problem, and solving it? *I will post the question as the first comment below. Any and all help is greatly appreciated!
Don't forget to show us YOUR efforts.
The problem: \[\int\limits_{0}^{a}x \sqrt({x^2 + a^2})dx, a >0.\]
Strongly suggest that you consider a substitution. What would that subst. be?
I tried using (x^2 + a^2)^(1/2) as u, but got nowhere, and I can vaguely see some relationships in the book and WolframAlpha'a answers, but to be honest, the "a" is throwing me off, and I'm not sure where to start here... :/
...Is the best "u" going to be x^2?
Maybe just the stuff inside the radical? All of it?
No, but that's better than your previous venture.
Let u = x^2 + a^2. Differentiate that, please. Find du/dx.
Notice that u=x^2+a^2 is all INSIDE the parentheses. Do not include the exponent in your substitution u (at least, not in this problem).
Hints: x usually represents a variable, whereas a usually represents a constant.
Gotcha! So... \[u = x^2 + a^2\] \[du = (2x + a^2)dx\] ?
Maybe \(u^{2} = x^{2} + a^{2}\) Did you know you could do that?
Nooo! :D So... u = x+1?
Stop for a minute and think: why are we bothering with a substitution? What would be its purpose? Note that you have Radical (x^2+a^2), with x outside the radical.
Before we go any further, consider that a and a^2 are not variables, but constants, using the conventions that x usually represents a variable and a a constant.
Say it with me, now..."The derivative of a constant is ______."
To get a derivative that's in the integrand?
what is the derivative of a constant? What is \[\frac{ d }{ dx }a^2?\]
Oh, duh Amon.. they're 0.
?
Correct. So, if your u is x^2+a^2, du/dx is what?
I thought you meant treat it like "e" or something.
Then... \[du = 2x*dx\]
e without an exponent is another constant. e with an exponent represents an exponential function.
Very good. du=2xdx. Note that you do have x outside the radical, but not the 2. Is there nevertheless a way to simplify the integral using substitutions?
Yes, I think? \[\frac{1}{2}du = x*dx\]
e - constant e^2 - constant e^x - exponential function
Then we can plug in the left for the right, and make what's in the radical "u".
Your original integral includes xdx, but not 2xdx. What are you gonna do about that? Good work ... you answered my qu as I was typing it. So, replace your xdx with du/2. Under the integral, replace your x^2+a^2 with u.
What do you end up with? Is it any easier to integrate than the previous form? Let's hope so.
Would appreciate your typing in the integral as it looks after 2 substitutions.
So given the algebra we did earlier working with "u"... \[= \int\limits_{0}^{a}\frac{1}{2}\sqrt{u}*du\] \[= \frac{1}{2}[\frac{2}{3}u^{3/2}] 0/a\]
\[= \frac{1}{3}(x^2 + a^2)^{3/2}, from 0 \to a\]
The limits of integration AFTER substitution are not necessarily the same as BEFORE substitution. Note that y ou let u=x^2+a^2.
But if I plug "u" back in, and am not plugging in the limit directly for the term "u" itself, then I keep the limits that were (are) in terms of "x" (or whatever the problem is initially in terms of), aye?
You can do that, but after going thru the trouble of substituting, why not keep u and forget about x^2+a^2? It's so much simpler. If x goes from 0 to a, what happens to u? u is your new variable and you thus need to compute the appropriate limits on u.
There's more than one way to skin a cat. You can either STICK with u, or you could re-substitute x^2+a^2 for u. My preference is that you stick with u.
x varies from 0 to a. Thus, if u=x^2+a^2, u varies from (what?) to (what?)
The latter values are your new limits of integration./
Gotcha:) I will agree to respectfully disagree with you, as you are far more knowledgable than I, but I will plug x^2 + a^2 back in:) Umm, u varies from... [2a^2 , a^2] ???
You can do that substitution; it's correct. However, by going back to x^2+a^2, you have abandoned u.
Do it both ways. You choose to plug x^2+a^2 back into the RESULT of your integration? Fine. Then let x vary from 0 to a. You cvhoose to stick with u? Fine. Since u=x^2+a^2, and a varies from 0 to a, u varies from a^2 to 2a^2.
I admire hunny's suggestion, that you let u^2=x^2+a^2. Doing this will eliminate the square root operation, which is a good thing. Simplification!
Regardless of the method used, you MUST end up with the same result. Else something is wrong.
I'm with you there! I'm working it out now... :)
Okay, I got: \[ = \frac{ 1 }{ 3 }(a^2)^{3/2}\] ??
Is that right?
Question: Can you simplify (a^2)^(3/2)? making good progress. I have to get off the 'Net right now, but will be back in 0.5-1.0 hour. Good luck!
Yes, you can, but is that the right answer in general, if I make (a^2)^(3/2) = a^(7/2)?
Let's re-write (a^2)^(3/2) as\[(a^2)^{\frac{ 3 }{ 2 }}\]
since one of the rules of exponentiaion is (x^a)^b=x^(ab), \[(a^2)^{\frac{ 3 }{ 2}}=\]
what?
Where is WolframAlpha getting the sqrt. of 2 here?
My bad on the exponents there...
If you use substitution, the integration becomes quite simple. I'd suggest you go thru with the integration yourself and then worry about that Sqrt(2) from Wolfram.
Here's what I got: \[\frac{1}{3}[x^2 + a^2]^{3/2}, 0/a\] \[= [\frac{1}{3}((a)^2+a^2)^{3/2}] - [\frac{1}{3}((0)^2+a^2)^{3/2}]\] \[= [\frac{1}{3}(2a^2)^{3/2}] - [\frac{1}{3}(a^2)^{3/2}]\] \[= [\frac{1}{3}(a^2)^{3/2}] = \frac{ 1 }{ 3 }a^{3}\] How does that look? :/
Sorry: I was detracted by another posted problem.
Having taken a quick (not really careful) look at your work, my first impression is that you've done well.
Cool. Have to get off the 'Net pronto, but will be back later. Admire your persistence and hard work! See you later.
Do you guys know where the \[2\sqrt{2} - 1 \] comes from? :/
\[= [\frac{1}{3}(2a^2)^{3/2}] - [\frac{1}{3}(a^2)^{3/2}]\] so you went from here to: \[= [\frac{1}{3}(a^2)^{3/2}] = \frac{ 1 }{ 3 }a^{3}\] how did you make the 2^(3/2) disappear?
\[=\frac{1}{3}2^\frac{3}{2}a^3-\frac{1}{3}a^3 \\ =\frac{1}{3}a^3(2^\frac{3}{2}-1)\]
I thought that the (2a^2)^(3/2) - (a^2)^(3/2) was just like subtracting 5x from 6x. So basically, the issue there was that I needed to distribute the power of 3/2 to the 2, and not treat it as such a coefficient?
you could have treated like if was outside the exponent if it was outside the exponent :p
\[2(a^2)^\frac{3}{2}-(a^2)^\frac{3}{2}=(2-1)(a^2)^\frac{3}{2}=1(a^2)^\frac{3}{2} \\ \text{ but } (2a^2)^\frac{3}{2}-(a^2)^\frac{3}{2}= 2^\frac{3}{2}(a^2)^\frac{3}{2}-(a^2)^\frac{3}{2}=(a^2)^\frac{3}{2}(2^\frac{3}{2}-1)\]
Ah.... I see.. :) Gotcha.
example (2*5)^2 is not the same as 2*(5^2)
(2*5)^2=10^2=100 or you could say (2*5)^2=2^2*5^2=4*25=100 but 2*(5^2)=2*25=50
2*(5^2) or 2*(5)^2 whatever
or you can even say 2*5^2 :p
2*(5^2)=2*(5)^2=2*5^2 but none of those are equal to (2*5)^2
So how would you treat or simplify this then: \[[\frac{1}{3}(a^2 + a^2)^{3/2}] = [\frac{1}{3}(2a^2)^{3/2}] ????\]
That's where I pulled the two into play, but if it's not to be treated like a coefficient, I'm confused about what's going on. :?
the 3/2 is on the (2a^2)
\[\frac{1}{3}(2a^2)^\frac{3}{2} \\ \frac{1}{3}(2^1 a^2)^\frac{3}{2} \\ \frac{1}{3}(2^{1 \cdot \frac{3}{2}} a^{2 \cdot \frac{3}{2}})\]
right, so doesn't it distribute into the "^2", just as it would if it was for example (x^2)^(3/2)?
Okay, I see where you're going there, but that's just so not intuitive for me... My bad I guess!
\[a^{2 \cdot \frac{3}{2}}=a^3\] since a>0
Right, I just didn't get the whole distributing the power across to the 2 in front of that a^2. :) I see what you mean completely now, albeit being still in a phase of working adjusting to thinking of everything this way. Thank you:)
oh ok well you could just ignore 2 being raised to the 3/2 power
\[\text{ for example } 2^3=8 \text{ \not } 2 \]
I know that seems like a stupid example \[(2a)^n=2^n a^n\]
Gotcha... gotcha indeed. I learn something new every night... :)
lol and you probably will for the rest of your life we never stop learning well until we become a vegetable or dead
Good Lord, I better never stop learning!!!!
lol
good luck with living forever
;) I'll be here!
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!