Ask your own question, for FREE!
Mathematics 22 Online
OpenStudy (anonymous):

Eigenvectors / eigenrooms (Question in comment)

OpenStudy (anonymous):

So I need a bit of help understanding how to find the eigenroom. So I understand that you take the "independent" variables and describe them as a vector, of the dependent ones. So like \[A=\left[\begin{matrix} 1 & -1 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & 1 \\ 0 & 0 & 0\end{matrix}\right]\] Would have \[u=\left[\begin{matrix} 1\\ 1 \\ 0\end{matrix}\right]\] Because I set up the equations \[x_1-x_2=0 -> x_1=x_2\]\[x_2=x_2\] But what if I have \[A=\left[\begin{matrix} 1 & 1 & -1 \\ 0 & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & 0\end{matrix}\right]\] How would i find the two vectors? that would give me the equations: \[x_1+x_2-x_3=0\]\[x_2=x_2\]\[x_3=x_3\] Right? And how do I find the two vectors from this?

ganeshie8 (ganeshie8):

what is the actual matrix ?

ganeshie8 (ganeshie8):

Don't you mean the matrix \(\left[\begin{matrix} 1 & 1 & -1 \\ 0 & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & 0\end{matrix}\right]\) represents \(A-\lambda I\) ?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

First I have, \[A=\left[\begin{matrix} 5 & -1 & 1 \\ -1 & 5 & 1 \\ 0 & 0 & 6\end{matrix}\right]\] Then I have found the 3 different eigenvalues, by taking the determinant of \[A=\left[\begin{matrix} 5-l & -1 & 1 \\ -1 & 5-l & 1 \\ 0 & 0 & 6-l\end{matrix}\right]\] And I got \[l=4,6,6\] Now when I insert \[l=6\] I get \[A=\left[\begin{matrix} -1 & -1 & 1 \\ -1 & -1 & 1 \\ 0 & 0 & 0\end{matrix}\right]\] And then from gaus elimination I get: \[A=\left[\begin{matrix} 1 & 1 & -1 \\ 0 & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & 0\end{matrix}\right]\]

OpenStudy (anonymous):

l is supposed to be "Lambda"

ganeshie8 (ganeshie8):

Now it makes sense... gimme a minute to go through your work :)

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Yea, sure, thanks :)

ganeshie8 (ganeshie8):

you may use `\lambda` to write \(\lambda \)

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Oh yea okay thx ;)

ganeshie8 (ganeshie8):

for \(\lambda = 6\), we do get two independent eigenvectors

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Yes, I am having trouble finding out how to find these, because I have \[x_1+x_2-x_3=0\]\[x_2=x_2\]\[x_3=x_3\], and I dont know how to describe those into 2 different vectors.

ganeshie8 (ganeshie8):

Easy, simply let \((x_2, x_3) = (1, 0)\) to get one eigen vector

ganeshie8 (ganeshie8):

Again let \((x_2, x_3) = (0, 1)\) to get another eigen vector

OpenStudy (dan815):

Whats an Eigenroom?? the set of eigen vectors that define different paralleipeds?

ganeshie8 (ganeshie8):

\[x_1+x_2-x_3=0\] plugin \((x_2,x_3)=(1,0)\) in above equation and solve \(x_1\)

ganeshie8 (ganeshie8):

These special values guarantee that you get "independent" eigenvectors

OpenStudy (anonymous):

\[x_1+x_2-x_3=0\] If I insert \[(x_2,x_3)=(1,0)\] do I then get \[x_1=-x_2\]?

ganeshie8 (ganeshie8):

plugin \(x_2 = 1\) and \(x_3=0\)

OpenStudy (anonymous):

\[x_1+1=0\]\[x_1=-1\]

ganeshie8 (ganeshie8):

\(x_1+1-0 = 0\) \(x_1=?\)

ganeshie8 (ganeshie8):

Yep, so one eigen vector is \((-1,1,0)\)

ganeshie8 (ganeshie8):

Let \((x_2, x_3) = (0, 1)\) to get another independent eigen vector

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Hmm. According to the test results (It is exam practice, where we have the answers) The answers are \[Span[(1,0,1),(0,1,1)]\]

OpenStudy (anonymous):

OpenStudy (anonymous):

I have 4 answers, the 4th says: Neither one of the above.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

And it says the answer is [3]

ganeshie8 (ganeshie8):

Yes, answer is indeed [3]

ganeshie8 (ganeshie8):

Our answer is also going to match with [3]

ganeshie8 (ganeshie8):

Can you finish it off ?

ganeshie8 (ganeshie8):

find the other eigenvector, don't wry about the options yet

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Yea, but wolframalpha / what we did gives 3 vectors?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Ok

OpenStudy (anonymous):

So next I would insert \[(x_2,x_3)=(0,1)\] \[x_1+0-1=0\]\[x_1=1\]

ganeshie8 (ganeshie8):

wolfram's 3 eigenvectors correspond to ALL the eigenvalues your test answer is referring to just the eigenvectors corresponding to the eigenvalue 6

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Yes, it was just before we got \[(-1,1,0)\] Which I assume comes from when \[\lambda =4\]

ganeshie8 (ganeshie8):

Yes. So, what are the eigenvectors corresponding to the eigenvalue 6 ?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

So we get:\[(1,0,1)\] and \[(-1,1,0)\]?

ganeshie8 (ganeshie8):

Yes. that looks good.

ganeshie8 (ganeshie8):

Now lets look at options

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Looking at options, using these vectors, I would choose [4], none of the above.

ganeshie8 (ganeshie8):

Not so fast. Recall that if \(v_1\) and \(v_2\) are any two eigenvectors, then any linear combination \(c_1v_1 + c_2v_2\) is also an eigenvector

ganeshie8 (ganeshie8):

\[(1,0,1)\] and \[(-1,1,0)\] Add these and look at options again

OpenStudy (anonymous):

That gives \[(0,1,1)\]

ganeshie8 (ganeshie8):

Yes, \((0, 1, 1)\) is also an eigenvector

OpenStudy (anonymous):

So yea, thats how they got it.

ganeshie8 (ganeshie8):

There is nothing special about the eigenvectors that we have got earlier. Any two "independent" eigenvectors will do the job

OpenStudy (anonymous):

So would this also work in another case, inserting \[(x_1,x_2)=(0,1)\] and \[(x_1,x_2)=(1,0)\]?

ganeshie8 (ganeshie8):

Which case ?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Well I dont know, just like in general

OpenStudy (anonymous):

If am to find to eigenvectors

OpenStudy (anonymous):

two*

ganeshie8 (ganeshie8):

You plugin special values for "free variables"

ganeshie8 (ganeshie8):

In our case, \(x_2\) and \(x_3\) are free variables because they don't have pivots

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Yeap, and these "special values" are they always (0,1) and (1,0)

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Or would they correspond to the values found in the other lines, like in our we have nothing. So we only have the equations \[x_2=x_2\] and \[x_3=x_3\]

ganeshie8 (ganeshie8):

You could use anything you like. But there is no guarantee that you get "indepdent" eigenvectors when you use random values/

OpenStudy (anonymous):

ohhh, so you insert a "smart values" that eliminates one of the free variables?

ganeshie8 (ganeshie8):

If we use the special values (0, 1) and (1, 0) etc for free variables, we always get "independent" eigenvectors

OpenStudy (anonymous):

yea, okay think I got it :)

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Thank you so much :)

ganeshie8 (ganeshie8):

np :) one sec, wait

OpenStudy (anonymous):

sure

ganeshie8 (ganeshie8):

try going thru this video when free http://ocw.mit.edu/courses/mathematics/18-06-linear-algebra-spring-2010/video-lectures/lecture-7-solving-ax-0-pivot-variables-special-solutions/ it expliains in detail how to cookup special solutions

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Thanks :)

ganeshie8 (ganeshie8):

finding eigenvectors require you to solve the system : \[\left[\begin{matrix} 5-l & -1 & 1 \\ -1 & 5-l & 1 \\ 0 & 0 & 6-l\end{matrix}\right]\begin{pmatrix}x_1\\x_2\\x_3\end{pmatrix}=0\] that video explains everythign about nullspace Enjoy...

Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!
Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!