When rounded to the nearest tenth, what are the points of intersection of the system y equals x squared minus three x minus three, y equals x plus one question mark Graph of the parabolic function y equals x squared minus three times x minus three and the linear function y equals x plus one. (−0.8, 0.2) and (4.8, 5.8) (−1, 1) and (5, 6) (0.2, −0.8) and (6, 5) (−0.9, 0.1) and (4.9, 5.9)
@whpalmer4 @paki @pooja195 any of you guys think you can help, or know this stuff?
yeah, no problem. what have you done so far?
well, I would like to know how to start this- this kind of math always troubles me, do you have any ideas for me?
yes. is one of the equations easy to solve for one of the variables in terms of the other?
if so, use it to turn two equations in two variables into one equation in one variable, which you then solve...
woah dude slow down... first off I am not yet sure what the unknown variables that are charted on the graph yet.
\[y=x^2-3x-3\]\[y=x+1\] those are your equations, right?
uh idk you tell me e.e.... i cant really read variables from graphs. however if you say so i believe you. :S
no graph needed, just read the problem statement
oh... i see it now.
ok, so you have two equations, both starting with \(y=\)
like terms first?
take the other side of both equations and set them equal to each other
second equation has a nice, simple expression for the value of \(y\), namely \(x+1\) so in the first equation, wherever you see \(y\), replace it with \((x+1)\)
that gives you \[(x+1)=x^2-3x-3\]is that something you can solve for the values of \(x\)?
I say values because having an \(x^2\) term as highest power of \(x\) in polynomial means there are 2 solutions, not just 1. we know that from looking at the graph, also, as the line intereects the parabola twice.
intersect* ... but anyways have we yet figured out what the graph reads im still a bit confused?
no need for the graph at all...
but we will check our answers against it when we have them
so, \[x+1=x^2-3x-3\]how are you going to solve that for \(x\)?
how about getting all of the terms on one side, what would that give you?
ok im back had to help my mom with something.
looking at the graph, we can see that one intersection is near \((5,6)\) and the other near \((-1,0)\) but we have two answer choices that are both close to those, and we can't read the graph accurately enough to tell which one is correct.
exactly.
so, we have to use algebra. can you do as I asked with that last equation I posted?
this one "how about getting all of the terms on one side, what would that give you?" or this - 'so, x+1=x2−3x−3 how are you going to solve that for x?"
whichever, same question :-)
well, can i start by trying to find like terms first? is that an option in this equation?
do whatever you think works...anything is fair game, just do it to both sides of the equation
im really having trouble understanding th whole 'both sides things. Are these opposing sides just to clarify? "x+1 (=) x2−3x−3 <---
if so ... im confused again because im not sure what i can do with that since x + 1 is already in a simple form.
unless, what if i plug in my answers into each equation? My closet estimate would be (−1, 1) and (5, 6)
look, the points where the two intersect are points where they have the same value of \(x\) and the same value of \(y\), right?
so at the spot on the left side where they intersect, the same value of \(x\) plugged into each equation gives exactly the same result for \(y\) from each equation. that means we can substitute one of the equations into the other. \[y=x^2-3x-3\]\[y=x+1\]if the left hand side is equal to the right side, and both left hand sides are identical, then we can set the right hand sides equal to each other. you could of it like this: \[x^2-3x-3=y=y=x+1\]\[x^2-3x-3=x+1\]now it is just some algebra to solve for \(x\) \[x^2-3x-3-x=x+1-x\]\[x^2-4x-3=1\]\[x^2-4x-3-1=1-1\]\[x^2-4x-4=0\] can you solve that equation with the quadratic formula, or factoring the square?
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!