Number theory conjecture... :D
\(\tau(n)\) is the divisor counting function, for example \(\tau(12)=6\) since there are six divisors of 12: 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 12. Conjecture: There exists one and only one number \(n\) with an odd number of divisors \(\tau(n) \equiv 1 \mod 2\) such that its total number of divisors is equal to the average of the adjacent divisors. \[\tau(n)=\frac{\tau(n+1)+\tau(n-1)}{2}\] That number is \(n=8836\) with \(\tau(8836)=9\) which is odd. So, proof or counter example, any ideas? :D
I feel like putting that n = 8836 just to verify that it's correct but it's a shoddish way to prove it.. because I was thinking that we have n = 12 and then into that formula I would need to find tao(13) and tao(11) which don't have that many divisors and both of those numbers 13 and 11 are prime.
I tested all numbers up to 100,000 and this is the only number that satisfies this. I could go higher I guess haha.
\[\tau(12)=\frac{\tau(13)+\tau(11)}{2}\] but then for 13 only 1 and 13 and 11 only 1 and 11 that's like 2 a piece. wtheck I got 2.
Wait a sec, that's not right, \[\tau(11)=2\]\[\tau(12)=6\]\[\tau(13)=2\] \[6 \ne \frac{2+2}{2}\] Although you did hit up on something interesting hmm.
I didn't really think about twin primes, they seem to be kind of related to this.
yeah I know that \[6 \ne \frac{2+2}{2} \] but 13 and 11 are both prime numbers . the only numbers divisible are 1 and itself. so for 11 1 and 11 so for 13 1 and 13
Oh I guess I'm not following why you wrote this: \[\tau(12)=\frac{\tau(13)+\tau(11)}{2}\] Also I just realized, in order for \[\tau(n) \equiv 1 \mod 2\] then n has to be a perfect square. That cuts out a ton of cases haha.
damn bro you didn't mention that. so n has to be perfect square numbers 4 25 36 la la la
Well it doesn't HAVE to be, I just figured this out! hahaha
Like look at 4: 1, 2, 4. The only way you can get an odd number of divisors is if the number is a perfect square, so it's the same condition really.
Same exact conjecture, just said more simply: Conjecture: There is only one perfect square such that its total number of divisors is equal to the average of the adjacent numbers divisors.
oh O_O!
25: 1 5 25 36: 1 6 36 (but for this number I swear the list is longer)
haha yeah: 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 9, 36
49 might work 49: 1 7 49
Ok so there's a rick to evaluating these things, \[\tau(ab)=\tau(a)\tau(b)\] if \(\gcd(a,b)=1\). So an example of this is probably much easier, and basically all this means is you can break it up into each of the prime factors like this: \[\tau(12)=\tau(4)*\tau(3) = 3*2 =6\] More generally but less general than the original first thing I put: \[\tau(p^xq^y) = \tau(p^x)\tau(q^y) = (x+1)(y+1)\] in fact for a prime, \[\tau(p^k) = k+1\]
OK another alternate notation is \(\tau(n) = \sigma_0(n)\).... why do I say that? Cause check this out: http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?t=crmtb01&i=tau(1468%5E2)+%3D+(+tau(1468%5E2%2B1)%2Btau(1468%5E2-1))%2F2
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!