Some Calculus Integration Help Please!!
@hartnn can you help?
@freckles can you help?
I have an answer, but I just need confirmation.
@mathmale can you help please?
My answer for the left-hand approximation is 2,115.
I'll help, subject to your sharing all that you already know about the first problem. I'm sure you understand some of it already. Which rule for approx. areas under curves do you wish to use? Because the problem specifies use of "left endpoints," we won't consider the Trapezoidal or Simpson Rule(s).
What is the interval width? Which x-value comes first, and how many x-values will we actually need? What's the height of the first approximating rectangle?
The interval width is 15
0 comes first and the height of the first rectangle 0
@mathmale
Yes. The first x-value, for left endpoints, is 0, and the corresponding y-value, which is the height of the approx. rectangle is 0. Good. and yes, the interval width is 15. What's a good name to give to this 15? Review example problems for this info.
a good name would be "n" right?
n = 15?
No. n represents the # of approx. rectangles. My question about the interval width should give you a strong clue. Try again. 15 is represented by the symbol ... ?
Delta x
Perfect. How many approx rect. will there be? How many y values are given you in the table?
Hint: Tricky question.
Okay since this is left-hand approximation i wouldn't use the last one so there are 8
V ery good. Now, what's the area of the first approx. rect? Show your work. Also, what's that of the 2nd?
(height of first rect.)(width of 1st rect) = (area of first rect) = ? area of 2nd rect = ?
The first is 0 because base = 15 and the height =0
Right. 2nd?
the second is 15*15 so it would be 225
Right. But...let's reread the instructions. They specify that n=4, right? Not 8. How will this affect your calculation of the area of the first rect? ...of the second rect?
Would i multiply it by 4?
No. You could do a really quick sketch showing that there are only 4 approx. rects., not 8. Then, again, calc the area of the 1st and 2nd rect. Hint: How wide are the approx. rects. if n=4 instead of n=8?
Oh okay the base would now be 30 so the second rectangle would now be 450
right. first is zero times 30; second is 18 times 30. Agree with the latter calculation?
Height of 2nd rec. is 18. Width is 30. Area is .... ?
yes so the second rectangle would be 540 i realized my mistake after i drew the picture
Now please find the areas of the 3rd and 4th approximating rect.
I won't be checking your work, so be really careful.
okay
The are of the third would be 570 and the area of the fourth would be 720
Now I add up all of the areas and that is the total approximation?
I'm going to take your word for that. How would you now come up with a single figure that represents the approx area under this curve when n=4? Explain.
0 + ? + ? + ? = ?
1830
comfortable with this approach? I believe we've nailed it (but as before, I'm not checking your calculations).
Okay i can do the rest thanks except canyou help with question 2
Unless you have questions about this, I'd like to move on to using the Trap Rule. Use of the right-hand rule follows precisely the same steps as we used for the left-hand rule, except that you begin x at 12 and work backward. n=4, so the interval width delta x is still 30. first approx rect. has a height of 120. OK with that?
Music?
Sorry
Yah so for the trapezoid rule the equation i use for the area is \[A = b *\frac{ h _{1} +h _{2} }{ 2 }\]
that's for a single trapez. The Trap Rule is based upon that but is quite different otherwise. Do you have in front of you a reference that shows the formula for the Trap Rule?
Yes it is T = (f(a) + 2f(x1) + 2f(x2)...+2(f(xn-1) + f(b)
That's part of the deal, but there's more to the deal than that.
\[A=\frac{ \delta~x }{ 2}[(your~ expression)\]
Where the interval [a,b] is divided into "n" equal sub-intervals [xi-1,xi]
Please note carefully: n=4 here. You must use n+1, or 4+1, or 5, x values and their corresponding y-values. Agreed? Yes, you're right on dividing up the interval [0,12].
Let's actually identify the 5 necessary y-values. What are they? List them here, please:
Oh and in the beginning of the equation there is a \[\frac{ b-a }{ 2n }\]
the five necessary y-values are 0,18,19,24,12
b-a/2n = 15
Regarding (b-a)/n: That's delta x. Regardng (b-a)/(2n): Multiply your 5-term expression by that.
In the end, your approach and mine should deliver precisely the same result.
Okay i will calculate my answer now
Wait please
oh okay
I've checked out the y-values and find that I have a dramatically different response. I claim that the set of y values is {0, 30, 60, 90, 120}.
Please accept that (after checking) or argue why this is not correct. ;)
Those are x-values though right?
Just kidding
Nope. You won't even need the x-values. Only the y-values. Really. Not kidding. ;)
Okay sothose are the values i use when calculating the traprule
I dont have and equation to do the trap rule though, or do i just use the given base and heights
Yes. One more thing. You have the coefficients right in your expression: They are: 1, 2, 2, 2, 1. compare this to your result...See what I mean?
delta x= (b-a)/n, yes. The desired approx. area, calc. with n=4, is \[A=\frac{ \delta~x }{ 2 }[1*f(x _{0})+2*f(x _{1})+2*f(x _{2}) + (2 ~more~ terms).\]
Type in the last 2 terms, please./
\[2*f(x _{3}) + f(120)\]
Good.
What is delta x in this case, given that n=4?
15
120/2*4
(b-a)/2 = delta x Is (12-0)/4 equal to 15?
i thought we were using the [a,b] from the integral
I'm willing to go along with whatever format you wish to use. Your format (b-a)/(2n) is different from mine, but is usable. I would begin my expression for Area as follows: \[A = \frac{ \delta~x }{ 2 }\]
okay so delta x would be 3 then
whereas you're beginning yours with
\[A =\frac{ (b-a) }{ 2n }\]
Go ahead and use whichever form you prefer.
Yes, I figure that delta x is 3, and thus I would start out my expression for A as \[A=\frac{ 3 }{ 2 }[f(x _{0}) + .... \]
okay
I was wrong earlier: we do indeed need to use 5 x-values, which are {0, 3, 6, 9, 12}. Do you agree with these values?
What i was doing was using the a and b values from the integral making a=0 and b=120
yes i agree with those values
Caution: Don't do that. [a,b] refers to [0,12], and not the y-values at all.
We are approx. an integral integrated from x=0 to x=12, not to x=120.
f(x) = y right?
Yes, y=f(x). But in this approximation problem, we identify and use 5 specific values for y.
Nothing to calculate, since all of the x and y values are given you in a table.
So if f(x) = y then why are we using the f(x) values for the interval from [a,b]
Recall: x is the independent variable, and here ranges from 0 to 12; y is the dependent, or function, value, and ranges from 0 to 120. Does that answer your question?
\[A=\frac{ \delta~x }{ 2 }[1*f(x _{0})+2*f(x _{1})+2*f(x _{2}) + (2 ~more~ terms).\]
Why is y the one that is labeled x in the table?
\[A=\frac{ 3 }{ 2 }[1*0+2*30)+2*f(x _{2}) + (2 ~more~ terms).\]
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!