Ask your own question, for FREE!
Chemistry 21 Online
OpenStudy (simplymarie_x):

Which of the following is a possible set of quantum numbers for an electron? Select one: a. (1, 1, 0, +½) b. (2, 1, 2, +½) c. (3, 2, 0, -½) d. (3, -2, 1, -½)

OpenStudy (simplymarie_x):

@Photon336 @alphadxg

OpenStudy (photon336):

What do you think @simplymarie_x ?

OpenStudy (simplymarie_x):

I think it's C?

OpenStudy (photon336):

\[m_{s} |fourth~quantum~number~spin| +\frac{ 1 }{ 2 } or ~ -\frac{ 1 }{ 2 }\] so this one doesn't really matter. so it's not the deciding factor.

OpenStudy (photon336):

the first quantum number is n that's the energy level. then there is l which is the shape/ then mL which I think of as orientation. mL can't be greater than l so right away B is eliminated. D is eliminated because L can't be negative.

OpenStudy (photon336):

let's look at a and c our first principle quantum number n = 1. right and l = 1 and mL = 0. Well, the last three numbers are okay but there is something about this that seems weird. it's the fact that n = 1 and l = 1 if l = 1 that means that there are three possible orbitals {-1,0,1} this would be the configuration of a p orbital but that's not the case, p orbitals start at n= 2. so that's wrong. for C we've got n = 3 and l = 2 mL = 0 if l = 2, mL can be (-2,-1,0,1,2) which means this is a d orbital. d orbitals start at n = 3. therefore, C makes the most sense.

Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!
Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!