Ask
your own question, for FREE!
Mathematics
15 Online
Prove or Disprove: −N := {z ∈Z : −z ∈N} has the Upper Well Ordering Property.
Still Need Help?
Join the QuestionCove community and study together with friends!
A set of numbers has the Upper Well Ordering Property if and only if every non empty subset has a greatest element.
Is it not that \(\mathbb N\) itself an uncountable set?
\(\mathbb N\) is natural number, hence \(z \in \mathbb Z| z\in \mathbb N\) is only \(-\mathbb N\) itself --> it is not an Upper well ordering set. (to me)
i didn't get why? can you please give me an example
Can't find your answer?
Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!
Latest Questions
heartlessprophet:
How do i get paid from work when im in job court ?
Aubree:
Guys, what does love feel like? I've been getting a tight chest and when I talk to him my heart rate hangs out around 100-120 beats per min, and when he doe
thereneelg:
ok... anyone have advice?? ...I did Choir all throughout Middle school and have ALWAYS been put in Soprano those three years.
kamariana:
The Byzantine Procopius is known for (5 points) reconquering much of the old Roma
chuckD:
hellp!!! what does it mean to describe a scientist as skeptical Why is sceptical
DoltonCarlee:
So like do y'all know anything about the first world war?
thehearken:
anyone know how to explain this so its easier for me to understand? b(1)=2, b(n)=
23 hours ago
0 Replies
0 Medals
1 hour ago
10 Replies
2 Medals
1 day ago
6 Replies
1 Medal
3 days ago
0 Replies
0 Medals
3 days ago
2 Replies
1 Medal
2 days ago
2 Replies
0 Medals
2 days ago
5 Replies
2 Medals