Question

Please don't get pissed at me for trying to dictate science with this, the paper said it.

Answer 1

Mary...the virgin. (Christianity) She did not have sex, would it be parthenogenesis?

Answer 2

The thing is parthenogenesis is with invertebrates ?

Answer 3

@Opcode

Answer 4

Parthenogenesis is for only asexual reproduction? Which generally has no sex determination, but I am pretty sure, Mary is considered female, and Jesus male, which is different sex.

Answer 5

Yeah but, it asks how did she get pregnant. I am wondering if just putting through the works of God is too...ignorant. So here I am, beating at the bush.

Answer 6

And I can't find any history of parthenogenesis (my choice) associating with human females.

Answer 7

I simply do not think the human body is designed for asexual reproduction, sure it is possible, but the matter of the case is it is stuck in theoretical dream. The human body is more oriented toward sexual reproduction, seeing as natural selection helps provide genes adapting to our time (the immune system is a good example).

I would label the case of Mary the Virgin to be a miracle, those if someone in the future happened to have something like it I would not call that a miracle as it is still possible in a theoretical sense.