Question

http://prntscr.com/co0te4 help me u intelligent beings

Answer 1

@Zarkon @Jamierox4ev3r

Answer 2

Oh lordy, proofs :}

Answer 3

yes ma'am we all love them

Answer 4

:(

Answer 5

i require assistance

Answer 6

well we can start by eliminating some options.

@Nnesha btw, it's good to see you again!

Answer 7

i would say B

Answer 8

since only one angle is clearly shown, and at least 1 side is shown

Answer 9

and the one that connects them is technically a congruent side

Answer 10

wait what does H L theorem do

Answer 11

the H-L theorem is the hypotenuse leg theorem. It states that any two triangles that have a congruent hypotenuse and a corresponding, congruent leg are congruent triangles

Answer 12

so it should be H-L theorem for this one

Answer 13

It seems like that to me, but I'm a bit iffy since the hypotenuses aren't marked as being equivalent

Answer 14

only the legs are

Answer 15

then what do u think it is

Answer 16

http://prntscr.com/co0vbv

Answer 17

i picked H-L

Answer 18

to be honest, I don't feel dead set on any of these. However H-L seems like the best answer, since we know that the angles and legs are equivalent, so the hypotenuse must be as well. Make sense?

Answer 19

yeah

Answer 20

sas means 2 sides and an angle is equivalent, which is basically the same thing

Answer 21

i picked HL, lets do next one

Answer 22

yep. That's why I wasn't certain, the definitions are too similar. And alright, I'm looking at it already

Answer 23

So it looks like we'll need another angle here, since once that's done, the sides are pretty much accounted for.

Answer 24

so that leaves you with either the first or third choice. Which one do you think it is?

Answer 25

C??

Answer 26

@Jamierox4ev3r

Answer 27

yup, nice

Answer 28

http://prntscr.com/co0xb3

Answer 29

@Jamierox4ev3r

Answer 30

so if we have perpendicularity, we know that there is one pair of sides is equivalent

Answer 31

i wanted to say not enough info

Answer 32

since we only have 1 angle and 1 side

Answer 33

then, we are given that one angle is equivalent, and perpendicularity tells us that they are both 90 degree angles. So I'm thinking asa

Answer 34

http://www.mathwarehouse.com/geometry/congruent_triangles/images/ASA/picture-laballed.png

Answer 35

yes but the side is already included in that angle

Answer 36

@AravindG check those answers xD

Answer 37

yes, but since we know that the line is perpendicular and those angles are equivalent, the sides must be equivalent too.

Answer 38

Yet another intricate proof rule

Answer 39

ok, im picking ASA

Answer 40

if u are wrong, u are dead

Answer 41

lol well that's how we did proofs at my school... I'm pretty sure it's right, and if it's not, your teacher can fite me

Answer 42

Too long so lazy to read haha

Answer 43

^ LOL thx, very helpul x'D