How do you think a self-anchored suspension bridge would support its load differently from a traditional suspension bridge?
Still Need Help?
Join the QuestionCove community and study together with friends!
Sign Up
Yugiv8:
A self-anchored suspension bridge is a suspension bridge in which the main cables attach to the ends of the deck, rather than to the ground via large anchorages. The design is well-suited for construction atop elevated piers, or in areas of unstable soils where anchorages would be difficult to construct.
Check DuckDuckGo
luvvdani1516:
@yugiv8 wrote:
A self-anchored suspension bridge is a suspension bridge in which the main cables attach to the ends of the deck, rather than to the ground via large anchorages. The design is well-suited for construction atop elevated piers, or in areas of unstable soils where anchorages would be difficult to construct.
Check DuckDuckGo
That's not really what I asked, but thank you for the answer.
Yugiv8:
oh sorry
KingDisgrace:
Maybe because if the bridge is self anchored, it relies on its supports more. When i hear self anchored I imagine that it's embedded in the ground and suspended while a traditional suspension is a bridge that is suspended above the ground without support, so the bridge has to ebb and flow with whatever you're carrying across. Sorry if this isn't what your looking for.. i gave it my best shot
luvvdani1516:
@kingdisgrace wrote:
Maybe because if the bridge is self anchored, it relies on its supports more. When i hear self anchored I imagine that it's embedded in the ground and suspended while a traditional suspension is a bridge that is suspended above the ground without support, so the bridge has to ebb and flow with whatever you're carrying across. Sorry if this isn't what your looking for.. i gave it my best shot