find k so that the line through 4,k and 2,-1 is perpendicular to y=2/5x-3
the slope of the line is -5. rise/run=-5 (k+1)/(4-2)=-5 solve for k
i mean -5/2 is the slope
do you know how to finish the problem?
no.
\[\frac{-5}{2}=\frac{k+1}{4-2}\]now "cross multiply" this clears the 2 from the denominator\[-5=k+1\]subtract 1 to find k\[-6=k\]
no you did it wrong.....shouldn't it be y2-y1 instead of y1-y2
so instead of k+1 at the top it should be -1-k
the slope of the given line is 2/5 the slope of the required line is -5/2 so the line must be in the form ,y=(-5/2)x+C,where C is some constant now apply the given points, (2,-1) we get, -1=(-5/2) (2)+C =>C=4 so the required line equation is y=(-5/2)x+4 now apply the other point ,(4,k)=>k=(-5/2)4+4 =>k=-10+4 =>k=-6
what if the points were written (2,-1) and (4,k)? would k then be y2?
yeah, but it's written as 4,k and 2,-1...therfore -1 is y2 and u start with it.
not so, what matters in the approach that colton started, is that you remain consistent with respect to the position of coordinates when you set-up the slope formula. Simply because one point is written to the left of another in the problem does not make it point1 or point 2, that is you choice. I chose the set that gave the fewest number of negative signs
but shouldnt we then get the same answer
is went right to left and i got -12
i**
That said, if you set it up and did it according to \[\frac{-5}{2}=\frac{-1-y}{2-4}\]you would get the same result.
i did that, then i got -10=-k-2
-10+20 i mean
you forgot to divide by 2 of the LHS; the LHS should be -5 not -10, then it works out
???
lhs?
LHS=left hand side
dont u cross multiply and dont have to divide?
lets see, if we cross multiply we get\[-2*(-5)=2(-1-k)\]\[10=-2-2k\]\[12=-2k\]\[-6=k\]
you forgot +20 in the first step and completely ignored the -4
it's 2-4
also go see dashni's solution; you might like that method better
2-4 in the right side denominator is -2; then you see the negative mutliplying the -5 on the right side after the cross mult.
i dont get why u just ignmored the -4 though
i didn't ignore the -4; i simplified 2-4=-2!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
ohhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh
WOW THAT MAKES SENSE NOW
there were a few responses between the start and restart of that way; I should have started from the beginning; btw, go see dashni's solution to the problem-- you might find it more to your liking
no i didnt get tht...urs was better.
actually it was colton's to start
in other news....have u read the hunger games?
I might check it out, thanks!
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!