Ask your own question, for FREE!
Mathematics 18 Online
OpenStudy (anonymous):

Diana and Joby wrote the following proofs to prove that vertical angles are congruent. Who is correct? Diana’s Proof Statement Justification 1 + 2 = 180° Definition of Supplementary Angles 1 + 4 = 180° Definition of Supplementary Angles 1 + 2 = 1 + 4 Transitive Property of Equality Joby’s Proof Statement Justification 2 = 4 Vertical angles are congruent. 1 = 3 Vertical angles are congruent. Vertical Angles are congruent. Vertical Angle Theorem

OpenStudy (anonymous):

OpenStudy (anonymous):

I' m thinking it is neither of them

OpenStudy (anonymous):

its 2 = 4 by transitive property

OpenStudy (anonymous):

So Joby's proof is correct

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Joby's proof can't be correct, he uses the fact that "vertical angles are congruent" to prove that "vertical angles are congruent", that can never be a valid proof. Diana's proof is the right one, if 1+2=180°, 2 must be equal to 180°-1 And if 1+4 = 180°, 4 must be equal to 180°-1 If 2 = 180°-1 and 4 = 180°-1, 2 = 4

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Diana didn't complete the proof.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Its not diana

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Well, it sure isn't Joby. Diana didn't complete the proof, but the last step is kind of obvious.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

so its neither then

Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!
Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!