Diana and Joby wrote the following proofs to prove that vertical angles are congruent. Who is correct? Diana’s Proof Statement Justification 1 + 2 = 180° Definition of Supplementary Angles 1 + 4 = 180° Definition of Supplementary Angles 1 + 2 = 1 + 4 Transitive Property of Equality Joby’s Proof Statement Justification 2 = 4 Vertical angles are congruent. 1 = 3 Vertical angles are congruent. Vertical Angles are congruent. Vertical Angle Theorem
I' m thinking it is neither of them
its 2 = 4 by transitive property
So Joby's proof is correct
Joby's proof can't be correct, he uses the fact that "vertical angles are congruent" to prove that "vertical angles are congruent", that can never be a valid proof. Diana's proof is the right one, if 1+2=180°, 2 must be equal to 180°-1 And if 1+4 = 180°, 4 must be equal to 180°-1 If 2 = 180°-1 and 4 = 180°-1, 2 = 4
Diana didn't complete the proof.
Its not diana
Well, it sure isn't Joby. Diana didn't complete the proof, but the last step is kind of obvious.
so its neither then
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!