Which of these is a valid conclusion? Swimmers do not dive in shallow water. Cathy is a swimmer. Therefore Cathy does not dive in shallow water. Swimmers do not dive in shallow water. Cathy dives in shallow water. Therefore, Cathy is a swimmer. Swimmers do not dive in shallow water. Cathy is a swimmer. Therefore Cathy dives in shallow water. Swimmers do not dive in shallow water. Cathy does not dive in shallow water. Therefore Cathy is not a swimmer.
HINT if a, then b if b, then c therefore, if a, then c
HINT 2: if a, then b a therefore, b
or you can take a guess at which sounds the most reasonable
(these are the patterns that valid logical arguments follow)
let's think through that idea...
a
yes :)
I meant A, I didn't mean B....haha
By the way, the former hint is called the "law of syllogism", and the latter is called the "law of syllogism"
Okay great, thanks for your help
welcome!
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!