Help me im stuck on this!!!
It's kinda of like putting a proof paragrpah together but idk >.<
angle 2 is congruent to angle 3 ----> vertical angle theorem
2 and 5 are supplementary, 3 and 5 are supplementary ----> definition of supplementary angles
Not sure about the rest :/
Ok thanks man
Got any idea of anyone who knows the rest? Im reaching my deadline ;/
Are you supposed to change the order of the statements on the left?
Yeah, you're suppose to match them and sorta make like a proof paragraph thing. As you can see I already got the first two so now i need that last four
Well, I think you should start by trying to put those statements on the left in order. What are you trying to prove? That should always be the last statement. The conclusion. And what is the most obvious thing? That should be the first.
Ok so...Given First and that's all i know xD
Jks uh let me see...hm...
Exactly right. They have given you some information. That should be your first statement.
Second statement is definition of sup angles
Vertical Angel theorem,converse of same side interior angles theorem,then Substitutions?
Okay let's work our way through this slowly. Definition of sup angles is right next. Then vertical angels is good. Let's see what we can justify from there. Converse of inside interiors isn't actually useful just yet.
So Substitutions next? it means like putting numbers where the letters are?
And converse for last because that proves that that line l and m are parallel
Yeah. Try substitution. And actually, it means substituting in whenever we know two things are EQUAL. So if I know that a+b = 5 and b= c, then I can substitute and write a+c = 5
Good =) Converse should be our last justification.
Ok Can i show you what i've put together? I took a picture of it.
2 = 3 is what you have first, but that's not given =(
opps its 2 and 5sup
one sec sorry this is such a long one...
Okay, so I really like that definition of supp angles is your second REASON. We want to use the fact that they are supp somehow. What is the definition of supp angles though? That should give me the statement.
ah either of two angles whos sum is 180
so i should switch those two around?
The 2+5 and the 3+5
Okay, so what should the second statement be. We said as our first statement "2 and 5 are supp" based on the definition, what does that give me?
vertical Angle Theorem?
You guessin'?
Wait... xD
You said "2 and 5 are supplementary because that is given." I would ask you "What does that MEAN?"
That means that angle 2 and 5 = 180 degrees
Great! =D That is your next statement.
Oh..So you're suppose to fill that in....kk
and the rest is right?
I feel so dumb lol sorry for this long question
It's okay. Try to make sure every thing is connected and leads up to your conclusion.
Show me what you have so far.
<2 and <5 are supplementary <2 <3 <3 and <5 are supplementary <2 + <5 =180° <3 + <5 =180° line l || line m Reasons Given Vertical Angle Theorem Converse of Same-Side Interior Angles Theorem Definition of Supplementary Angles Definition of Supplementary Angles Substitution
That right?
I thought we agreed that 2+5 = 180 should be our second statement.
ok
make it floooow
start with the given. That much is easy. The fact that 2 angles are supplementary FLOOOWS easily into the 2+5 = 180. The USE that fact to FLOW into 2+3 = 180. How do I get there? I need 3=5 to make it flow.
ok
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!