Nathan wrote the following steps to prove the equation: Given: 3(x + 2) = 6x + 3 Prove: x = 1 Which step of justification is incorrect, and what should the justification for that step be to solve the equation? Step 4; Commutative Property of Multiplication Step 3; Reflexive Property of Equality Step 1; Associative Property of Addition Step 2; Subtraction Property of Equality
@nbouscal, someone is accusing you of incorrect maths. @LivForMusic, which one do you think it is?
i think the answer is "Step 3; Reflexive Property of Equality" b/c ive never heard of "Symmetric Property of Equality"
Reflexive property of equality means \(a=a\). Also, step 3 is justified. So, it's not that one. Try again. Symmetric property of inequality means \(a=b\) implies \(b=a.\)
then it would be "Step 2; Subtraction Property of Equality" ?
Correct. Good job.
Typo: should be "symmetric property of equality"
@Limitless wait so am i correct? that it is "Step 2; Subtraction Property of Equality"
@LivForMusic, yes. I was correcting myself. See where I wrote "inequality"? I should have wrote "equality". Sorry for the confusion.
oh ok. thanks :)
You're welcome! Have a good day now.
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!