1.A counterexample is necessary to draw a conclusion by inductive reasoning. True False 2.Inductive reasoning involves applying a general rule to a specific situation. True False
counterexamples are used to disprove something. induction if going from particular to general (like evolution theory)
k, thanks for replying, but how do you draw a conclusion by inductive reasoning? and 2 is false?
by steps. like with mathematical induction.
your not allowed to say true or false?
a counterexample is used to disprove things. for instance if you say "all pretty girls are stupid" how would you disprove this?
okay.by using a counterexample
yes. so you go and find a pretty girl that is also smart. you can't use a counterexample to prove something
so you would use a counterexample in an inductive reasoning to prove your conclusion is actually wrong.
by the way u r right, 2 is false
k, thanks for the help helder. both of them false
u r welcome
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!