Make a two-column proof showing statements and reasons to prove that triangle NMT is similar to triangle NMP
I despise the two-column proof, but lets make a start.
A two-column proof is a table that has two columns—a statement column and a justification column
i started to learn it but i just still dont understand it
Sorry, should control myself. I mean it's two formal and hides the important steps.
Hah. meant too for two
its ok . i just dont understand how to break things down
Make a two-column proof showing statements and reasons to prove that triangle NMT is similar to triangle NMP The problem with this is that they are not similar.
They share an angle and a side and are clearly different in the example.
only an angle and a side.
I guess they want you to start the proof and then run into trouble? Weird.
Do we have the correct figure?
the figure there is the correct figure
to this problem
Sorry NMT and NMP. So they want you to show that the smaller NMT is similar to NMP the big one. I was thinking the other one. Still, they're not similar I don't think.
NMT is close to isosceles, but NMP clearly is not.
Other than looking at it, I don't know a way to make progress with this, and I don't think they are similar. HTH.
see this is the question .
Sorry I don't speak that file type. What program do you use?
i use open office. but i can change it . which program do you use?
Can you take a screenshot. Like a png or tiff or jpg ..
yes one sec
wat about rtf. ? can i save as rtf ?
fine
I know what it has to be. NT = NM
Yes? If that's true I can prove what they say, and it's just the drawing is bad.
my computer wont let me post it.. it keeps freezing bu the figure is the correct figure.
Is NT = NM? Is that in the problem statement?
i have to provide it myself i can give an example on how its sapposed to look like
Hey, I have the figure already. Just look at the text and tell me if there is more there than what you posted at the top. Especially, is NT = NM? I think that has to be there because then it all works out.
no it doesnt have that . i'll try to post it again.
OK, gotta go. Here's the sketch. If NM = NT, then triangle NMT is isosceles. And if that's true each of the other angles is equal to ( 180 - 50) = 65. So angle NMT is 65. But NPM is also 50 So PNM is 65 By angle angle angle, they are similar OK?
ok
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!