Question

What is the most important reason to publish results as scientific process?

Answer 1

I'd probably say peer review, so that the results can be seen and tested by other scientists.

Answer 2

http://www.madsci.org/posts/archives/dec97/876188567.Ot.r.html

Publication is also vital to science as a whole. One of the cornerstones of the scientific process is the free exchange of information. As long as everyone publishes their results, Science progresses foreward: if someone publishes a new finding, other scientists can use that information to expand their own work and build upon the new findings, rather than every scientist having to do every experiment independently. Similarly, publication is essential for each scientist, because the review process gives the researcher a broader view of the work, and often suggests fruitful paths that the scientist may not have otherwise taken.

Answer 3

http://www.onk.ns.ac.rs/archive/Vol10/PDFVol10/V10n3-Educational%20symposium.pdf

Why to publish? Teaching about truth. Scientific information as a resource.

Answer 4

It allows other scientists to check findings