which of thee statements is correct about a scientific theory

Question

kainui · Answer

Scientific theories are bad retrice

kainui · Answer

@Kainui correct!

shane_b · Answer

@Kainui: "Scientific theories are bad retrice" - what does that mean?

@ksophie23: What are your answer choices?

kainui · Answer

retrice is apparently the censor for a synonym for a person's posterior.

shane_b · Answer

I looked it up before posting and it appears to be the long wing & tail feathers on birds...which made no sense.  What dictionary are you using?!

kainui · Answer

I mean, I didn't type retrice. It just automatically changes bad words for you. I'll try a few others. pellet, flutter, tits.

shane_b · Answer

lol..ok

kainui · Answer

I guess it's an owl thing lol.

anonymous · Answer

@Kainui Open Study has a word filter for bad words? Is this real?

kainui · Answer

Yeah, just try swearing here. I discovered:
pellet is the 4 letter s word for poop
flutter is the 4 letter f word for sex
retriceis the 3 letter a word for butt

I'm sure there's many more lol.

anonymous · Answer

~~~Test~~~

bastard
vagina
jizz
dildo
queef
rimjob
feltch
chode
douche
feather
owletgot
whore
slut
wingspan
sleek-feathered one

kainui · Answer

I think I know what owlet is lol.

kainui · Answer

3 letter f word for homosexual

kainui · Answer

Now what about wingspan, sleek-feathered one, and feather?

anonymous · Answer

The last one is actually pretty hilarious.

anonymous · Answer

B word -> feather
C word -> wingspan

kainui · Answer

$$\frac{ pellet }{ ? }$$ Just curious if equations pass the word filter or not. Lol wingspan.

anonymous · Answer

I'm working on your equation, btw. For the overhand knot? I'll probably come up with something by tomorrow.

kainui · Answer

Yeah good luck, I think the key is to use polar coordinates. I am also interested in plotting all knots of any kind, really.

anonymous · Answer

Well, there are infinitely many different ways to parametrize the general form of a certain knot. And I don't just mean infinite like the integers, or even infinite like the real numbers, if you know what I mean. I think that the infinity here is at least $\aleph_2$. So... If you want this "knot-plotting pursuit" to be meaningful, you might want to set some specifications. But who am I to judge; I don't even know what your end aim is. If you just want to be able to look at knots, http://www.earlham.edu/~peters/knotlink.htm#software Look under "Software for knot theory"