Is the following relation a function?
x y −1 −2 2 3 3 1 6 −2
no its not a function because the one of ur y values has 2 x values and to be a function every y value should have one x value
only one x value*
k thanks
actually it is a function
why @satellite73
all you have to check is that the first numbers (domain elements) do not repeat
since they are all different, it does represent a function it makes no difference if the second numbers (range elements) repeat or not
satellite73 its not a function because the y value has -2 twice so its not a function
no, that means it is not a one to one function the constant function \(f(x)=3\) is a function, for example, even though it sends all numbers to 3
mmm :/
@briszabo carefully read the purple math link you sent, look particularly at example 2
@Gabylovesyou trust me on this one for a relation to be function, all that is necessary is that the domain elements do not repeat so for example you could not have x y 1 3 2 4 1 2 because in that example 1 repeats
but in your example none of the domain elements (the \(x\) s ) repeat, so it is a function
ik im right because i just took a test and said it wasnt a function and got it right
Part 1: Create a relation of five ordered pairs that is a function. In complete sentences explain why this relation is a function. Part 2: Create a relation of five ordered pairs that is not a function. In complete sentences explain why this relation is not a function. ESSAY SUBMISSION part 1 relations: {(0,1),(55,22),(3,-50),(5, 2),(-3, 9)this relation is a function because the y value only has one x value for each pair. part 2 relations that aren't a function: {(-1,7) , (1,-7),(1, 7),(33, 7),(32, 7)} its not a function because the y value has more then one x value each. ESSAY FEEDBACK Brianna, You have illustrated relations as functions and non functions perfectly. Mrs. Griffiths Grading Specialist Points earned on this question: 4 heres what my teacher told me
you can repeat y value, period function do repeats,
@briszabo I have that same question!!!!!!! Can you answer it but with different numbers??
it is a function
yes i can
thank you !! @briszabo
anytime
ok everyone just put yes or no! and ill see what ill put
its a function
it's a function
@briszabo so @satellite73 was right??
yes
alright :)
no offence, but mrs griffith grading specialist is an idiot
:) i just asked my teacher
LMAO!!!!! alright can you help me on that question you had now?
not really surprising to me, since many math teachers at the secondary level are less than competent
whoa
yea i sure can
lol!!! thanks @briszabo
@briszabo just because you math teacher is confused, doesn't mean you should be this line part 2 relations that aren't a function: {(-1,7) , (1,-7),(1, 7),(33, 7),(32, 7)} its not a function because the y value has more then one x value each. is incorrect. the relation is not a function, that is right, but the reasoning is wrong the reason it is not a function is because there are two ordered pairs, namely (1,-7) and (1,7) with the same first coordinate it is not because "the y value has more than one x value"
if your teacher really read carefully he or she should know it is incorrect. my guess is, on the other hand, that he or she was so pleased to get a correct example that they did not bother to read further
ur so rude do talk about my teachers assiasant like that
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!