Are these logically equivalent (please explain why or why not): Statement (Conditional): If I get an A on my math homework, then Dr. Madness will be defeated. Code #1 (Inverse): If I do not get an A on my math homework, then Dr. Madness will not be defeated. Code #2 (Converse): If Dr. Madness is defeated, then I got an A on my math homework. Code #3 (Contrapositive): If Dr. Madness is not defeated, then I did not get an A on my math homework. **I got the rest of my work done but this part confuzzled me, lol. Please help.?
Contapositive of a statement is always true, if the original statement is true
which part confuses you @that1chick
I just dont get how to explain if something is logically equivalent
the lesson didnt giva a good example
ok well lets just go thru all the statements and see y the other ones r not logically equivalent
if you show me how to do the first, i can probably get the rest..
so if dont have an A, then hes not defeated... right? lol
Ok so if I get an A then Dr madness will be defeated that is our original statement
for the Contrapositive
do u know abt truth tables btw?
sry, paying attension.. pray continue
truth table?
thats right @that1chick lets go one by one... as @swissgirl is trying to help..
Dr Madness will be defeated if he gets sick down with cold also... your getting A is just one way of defeating him
you mean statement vs nagation..? @swissgirl
okay, so theres other way to beat him
my way just helps me too (:
so all we know is that if I get an A then Dr. Madness will be defeated Inverse: If I dont get an A then Dr. Madness will not be defeated This isnt equivalent to the original statement cuz he can get defeated anotherr way like @ganeshie8 said all we know is that if i get an A then he will be defeated
toshea
yup! original statement DOESNT specifically say, your getting A is the only way to defeat him. so there are other ways too..
Converse: If Dr. Madness is defeated then I got an A As we said b4 he can get defeated another way
for the Converse, just cuz he is defeated doesnt mean I get an A, right?
yes
BUTTTTTT the last statement says If Dr. Madness is not defeated then I didnt get an A is logically equivalent to our original statement since if he was defeated then i got an A but since he wasnt defeated then obv i didnt get an A
thanks yall for helping me not be such a dits xD
and yall made it towhere i wont need help on this type of problem again! double thanks!! (:
hhahahah your welcome :)
**Basically it’s a one-way street, if I get an A then he was defeated, but just because he was defeated does not necessarily mean I got an A as there could have been other ways to defeat him. <--- summed up ;D
yesssssss kinda but its a two way street in my opinion since if he wasnt defeated than I didnt get an A
u just forgot to include the last statement
his defeat does not mean I got an a, but my A means he was defeated
but u need to include that if he wasnt defeated then i didnt get an A
so, if I did not get an A then he could have still been defeated and him getting defeated does not mean I got an A
Wanna read my thing to see if I got it right? ...its kinda long
ya y not. U r correct with what u r saying but u left out a point that if he isnt defeated then I didnt get an A
1. From the conditional statement that you wrote, determine if the inverse, converse, and contrapositive are logically equivalent. Explain for each statement why or why not.
The conditional statement is “If I get an A on my math homework, then Dr. Madness will be defeated.” This is not logically equivalent to the (inverse) statement “If I do not get an A on my math homework, then Dr. Madness will not be defeated” because he can get defeated another way than by me getting an A on my math homework. The same goes for the (converse) statement “If Dr. Madness is defeated, then I got an A on my math homework” as he can be defeated other ways than by me getting an A on my math homework. However, the (contrapositive) statement “If Dr. Madness is not defeated, then I did not get an A on my math homework” as the condition statement had stated that if I got an A, then Dr. Madness was defeated which is equivalent to saying that if Dr. Madness was not defeated, then I get no A. **Basically it’s a one-way street, if I get an A then he was defeated, but just because he was defeated does not necessarily mean I got an A as there could have been other ways to defeat him. Also, if I did not get an A then he could still have been defeated, and him getting defeated does not mean I got an A. Point blank, if he isn’t defeated then there is not way I got an A.
thanks, I had forgot that part
ok I just corrected a few minor details. Sorry it took soo long my sis was just bothering me The conditional statement is “If I get an A on my math homework, then Dr. Madness will be defeated.” This is not logically equivalent to the (inverse) statement “If I do not get an A on my math homework, then Dr. Madness will not be defeated” because he can get defeated another way than by me getting an A on my math homework. The same goes for the (converse) statement “If Dr. Madness is defeated, then I got an A on my math homework” as he can be defeated other ways than by me getting an A on my math homework. However, the (contrapositive) statement “If Dr. Madness is not defeated, then I did not get an A on my math homework” is logically equivalent to the original conditional statement since if I got an A then Dr. Madness was defeated but if Dr. Madness wasn't defeated then its impossible that I got an A and therefore I didnt get an A **Basically it’s a one-way street, if I get an A then he was defeated, but just because he was defeated does not necessarily mean I got an A as there could have been other ways to defeat him. Also, if I did not get an A then he could still have been defeated, and him getting defeated does not mean I got an A. Point blank, if he isn’t defeated then there is not way I got an A.
thanks
now I just gotta figure out how to answer the last question so I can turn it in(:
what is the last question?
The mayor isn’t as good at geometric proofs as the Geo Squad. Explain to the mayor how using geometric proofs helps maintain the order in Geo City.
lol cant help u with that but post that question on another post and see what u get. Maybe others can answer that
k thanks (:
noooo close this question and then ask another one
its gonna confuse everyone
i was about to ask you that lol
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!