Anyone familiar with mathematica?
http://www.math.ysu.edu/~faires/Numerical-Analysis/Programs/programs/mathematica/ I need help with ALG023.MA I evaluated the notebook
and I entered the function \( \large e^{6x}+3(ln2)^2e^{2x}-(ln8)e^{4x}-(ln2)^3 \)
Like I am not sure how to enter this function
hmmmmmmmm
@nincompoop r u there?
ohhhhhhh Ill try to input that
This is how your input should be in formal Mathematica notation: Exp[6x]+3 Log[2]^2 Exp[2x]- Log[8] Exp[4x]- Log[2]^3
hmmmm not sure gotta play around a lil Thanks guys :)
@experimentX Can u help me out?
like I think smth is wrong since I think its taking too long to converge
So maybe I am inputting it incorrectly
this right? http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=e^ {6x}%2B3%28ln2%29^2e^{2x}-%28ln8%29e^{4x}-%28ln2%29^3 do you know WA interprets latex?
nooooooooooooooooooo
lol ... probably you should remove { } E^(6 x) + 3 Log[2]^2 E^(2 x) - Log[8] E^(4 x) - Log[2]^3
ok let me tryyyyy
for these types ... create a W|A accound (free one) ... sometimes it let's you copy things around ... like Mathematica input
ohhhhhhhh i willll
smth is going wrong with my mathematica ughhhh
idk smth is weird a number my book got for the 6th itteration I got for the 16th iteration
so either I am entering smth incorrectly orrrrrrrrrrr there is some typo
how did u get that?
Like how can i do that input output thingy?
copy paste .. lol
Like u see I got for 16 --> -0.182888 and the book got this number for the 6th iteration So I kinda have a sneaky feeling that somehow the program is messing up
Newtons method involves dividing the function by its derivative so I wonder if the derivative is getting messed up
when it comes to programming mathematica ... i at zero level. If it were Matlab ... i could have re- programmed it
try this Log[4] == Log[2]^2
So like how wold u get it to be (log[2])^2?
Where should i try that?
try to create a new notebook ..
ohhhhh
It said false
lol I dont know a thing from beanssss
Just followed what u told me to do idkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkk
lol whadya mean?
I am confuzzleddddd
When I enter Log[2]^2 does mathematica read it as Log[4]?
Or does it read it as (log(2))^2?
this means Log[2]^2 not equal to Log[4]
YAYYYYYYYYYY
Ok maybe there is a typo in my book whtvr
I am totally driving u guys crazyyyyyy
you should learn programming http://www.mathprogramming-intro.org/ google them, there are lot's of stuff ... I'm learning after exams
ikkk I should. I just dont know where to begin
Ill bookmark this page
I just never have time in my life idkkkkkkkkkkk I think i gotta start organizing my life
haha ... you should learn from how to evaluate expression ... probably
Probabbbbllyyyyy
hahah the only time I learnt about programming was back in HS we learnt visual basics hahahah which isnt relevant
no one works with VB these days. I tried to do a VB in second year. it was a failure. I don't know why everyone is interested in python these days.
idk It seems like C++ is what everyone studies idk
i learned C on undergrad school ... tried to learn c++ ... didn't complete it.
i thin i'll try to learn python/mathematica/matlab ... after exam
hahahah ure always learning after exams
idk I am getting sick of studying. Nothings interesting nemore. idk The course I am taking right now is soooooo boring. idk Like after a while u just get sick of everything
probably you skipped the basics ... mathematics always seemed interesting. my teachers were awful ... didn't understand algebra well. I failed in finals of my final year.
idk Its numerical methods and I get headaches when like computing with tiny numbers. I keep on having to check if I am made a mistake. I guess I am not cut out for math :(
yeah ... i don't like it either ... Maybe i failed the day before yesterday's exam because of it. seeing it I thought it could ... but due to lack of practice i couldn't do it.
U recently took that course toooo????
I have it in my course ... Mathematical physics.
ohhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh its very technical and I so hate it. maybe it will get a lil bit nore exciting. Its like its a no brainer once u know the formulas u just enter all the info
well ... i still love deriving the Euler's method and Newton's Rhapson's method ... I hate RK-4 ,,,,
didnt get up to RK-4 yet
Are u familiar with aitken's method?
the picture looks beautiful http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/e/e0/NewtonIteration_Ani.gif/300px-NewtonIteration_Ani.gif
Ohhhhh i lovee thattttt
probably not ... i skipped the whole chapter. all i studied for exam was RK-4 and Newton interpolation ... lol ...i couldn't do both.
lol ya well i dont have to take exams I just have to hand in work So i dont have to memorize any formulas
very nice for you ... you don't want to be in my position right now.
No i reallyyyyyy dont lol
my stat 1 down -- flunked 3 remaining --- gonna drop probably
Cuz u r taking wayyy too many courses at once
this year I'm dead :(((
probably i should quit physics and start math ... lol
lol but ure finished with ur undergrad? Like I kinda find it crazy that ppl study for sooooo long
yeah ... i graduated with physics, and half way through grad school ... tried to get extra math in undergrad .. failed on both.
Once u graduate then what?
dunno ... it's just so nice to be freeloader at home being student.
lol hahahahah i guesssss
yeah ... 1/3 of life is gone this way these days studying .. or even more.
http://a7.sphotos.ak.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ak-ash3/546053_3789383858455_1259887902_n.jpg until you reach the top of that parabola ... you are still a student.
omggg I dont like that lol
somebody named it cycle of life ... lol
Well it is the cycle of life.
yeah ... kinda feel pretty bad to grow old and for the old
Ya it makes u feel like u wasted ur life idkkk
I'm still at my prime for my age ... but not career :((
Once u hit the prime of ur career afterwards it heads downwards
hahahaha ...
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!