What two changes could you make to the following statement to make it true? A ray has two endpoints and extends infinitely in opposite directions
If a ray were to have two endpoints, it'd include the definition of a line and be fallacious, since it could not extend infinitely, yet be finitely bound. It must have only one end-point, unless we're working in different geometries.
?????
line=>"line segment" A ray cannot have two endpoints if it extends infinitely. It may only have one endpoint. (Although there are specifics to this, this is the jist).
but what 2 statments would make it true?
A ray is a figure which has a single end point, and extends infinitely in one direction. Now, figure out what is wrong with the given definition, based on the one I just gave.
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!