Question

Part 1:Fill in the missing row of the truth table.
Part 2:Are the two statements logically equivalent? Why or why not?
(p∧~q) and ~(p∨q)

Answer 1

Use De Morgan's laws:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/De_Morgan%27s_laws

Answer 2

@MathLegend please help

Answer 3

I'm sorry but I have never done a truth table. Is this College?

Answer 4

no this is geometry honors. i dont get it at all

Answer 5

high school

Answer 6

let me see if I can look it up in my Geometry textbook.

Answer 7

thank you so much

Answer 8

@emileexo
On the missing row, the first two columns are F and T.
Can you take care of the rest?

Answer 9

Sorry I can't help. I was not taught this. :(

Answer 10

thanks anyways @MathLegend

Answer 11

thanks but i dont know how to do the rest @mathmate

Answer 12

Have you done truth tables for simple operators like
~ negation
V or
^ and
<-> biconditional
-> conditional
Normally you would have a table for each of the operators, and better still, you would know them by heart.

Answer 13

sorry. all i know are the "or" and "and" signs. i wasnt taught this. this is the first time i ever see it @mathmate

Answer 14

does there have to be 2 T's and 2 F's in each column?

Answer 15

@ivandelgado

Answer 16

Have you done a truth table of any kind yet?

Answer 17

There is a comprehensive list of truth tables here:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Truth_table
Based on the basic operators, we can construct the truth table of compound operations.

Answer 18

There is an example of compound operations near the end of the article, if you teacher hasn't given you any.