Which of the following was the key evidence against Sacco? He lied to police following his arrest. His cap was found near the crime scene. He had been in trouble with the police for his political activities. One of the bullets was said to have been fired from his gun.
1 sec, I'm doing something
okay.
Okay I'm back
Two defense experts (Burns, Fitzgerald) testified that "Bullet 3" could not have been fired from Sacco's Colt. Sacco denied ever owning the cap, or any cap with earlaps. Sacco tried on the cap before the jury and claimed that it did not fit (the prosecutor claimed that it did). It is not known for sure that the cap found at the scene belonged to one of the murderers, and not to one of the crowd who gathered soon after the crime. Sacco testified that his lies during his initial police interview were because he feared that if he told the truth about his radical beliefs or admitted knowing radical friends, he would likely be deported. --------------------------- In 1961, a ballistics test conducted at the Mass. Police Lab suggested that Sacco's Colt was used to fire "Bullet 3." --------------------------- In the Lowell Committee hearings it was revealed that the hole in the cap was made by Jeremiah Gallivan, the chief of police of Braintree. Can you decide?
A prosecution medical expert compared hairs found in the cap with some from Sacco's head, and found them to be identical, but the expert was not asked to testify.
The main evidence against the men was that they were both carrying a gun when arrested.
So the answer is...?
i would have to go with. b or d
The answer is d) because him wearing the hat near the crime scene doesn't mean he was guilty because anyone can wear a hat. However, ballistics conducted that the bullet fired match his gun.
D is the correct answer!!!!!
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!