Question

Two scientists did the same experiment but arrived at different results. The results would most likely

provide new testable ideas

expose the weaknesses of science

cause confusion in the scientific community

emphasize the need for not repeating scientific results

Answer 1

d

Answer 2

If I catch the question correctly, you require a common (either) philosophical answer. Here it is. Science is a term of structured (logical proved) description of nature effects or effect of combining natural effects. To achieve this Description (i.e. a Book of Chemistry), Science mostly uses Modeling Instruments, which provide the Maths. To make it shortly, many mathematical formulas describe physical laws (motion, radioactivity etc.). If two science doing same experiment, independent each other achieve different results, means that they did not had same conditions during the experiment. Modeling an Experiment with Formulas shell forecast results and depending variables, such as time, position or others. Different results on same experiment shell point of a misunderstanding the corn of experiment. How to approach at this case. Write down on a list of paper all participants variable you can figure out. Explain the Problem to a friend and let his ideas also on a sheet of paper. Put all topics as a Star Schema, bind them as a Graph, according their dependency on each other and try to find out if non-pairs appear (unbind nodes). This is based on the concept of Law of Preserving, which is described by a simple equality (left = right side an equation). Therefore pairs. Trying to find out, what is wrong on an experiment requires sometimes multidimensional thinking. Sharing a problem to other stakeholders helps a lot. When similar results are achieved, make a Model (drawing, Formula, logical term so on).