Ask your own question, for FREE!
Mathematics 12 Online
OpenStudy (anonymous):

how would i write this phrase in formal logic

OpenStudy (anonymous):

"for all non negative real x"

OpenStudy (anonymous):

what phrase?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

oh.. haha!

OpenStudy (anonymous):

I do know but my latex sucks, hehe.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

One sec

OpenStudy (anonymous):

\[\forall x \in R > 0\] is wrong isnt it?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

I would rather use R_+

OpenStudy (anonymous):

i know of that but that hasnt been introduced anywhere earlier. i guess the actual question is how to place more than one condition on a range?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

\[\forall{x}\in\Bbb{R},x\ge0\]

OpenStudy (anonymous):

does that not say "for all real x , x must be greater than zero ?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

By itself, maybe, but it's not meant to stand alone.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

so this makes sense? \[\forall x, x>0 \text{ }\exists y \in R, y >0 : y^2 = x\]

OpenStudy (anonymous):

i havent done much of this stuff, started the other day

OpenStudy (anonymous):

\[\forall{x}\in\{x\mid x\in\Bbb{R}\land x\ge0\}\]... maybe?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

i like that

OpenStudy (anonymous):

thanks

OpenStudy (anonymous):

hey schmeig.... :) how 'bout this: "I am disinclined to acquise to your request. I lack the capacity to..."

OpenStudy (anonymous):

hehe

Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!
Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!