Mathematics
12 Online
OpenStudy (anonymous):
how would i write this phrase in formal logic
Join the QuestionCove community and study together with friends!
Sign Up
OpenStudy (anonymous):
"for all non negative real x"
OpenStudy (anonymous):
what phrase?
OpenStudy (anonymous):
oh.. haha!
OpenStudy (anonymous):
I do know but my latex sucks, hehe.
OpenStudy (anonymous):
One sec
Join the QuestionCove community and study together with friends!
Sign Up
OpenStudy (anonymous):
\[\forall x \in R > 0\] is wrong isnt it?
OpenStudy (anonymous):
I would rather use R_+
OpenStudy (anonymous):
i know of that but that hasnt been introduced anywhere earlier. i guess the actual question is how to place more than one condition on a range?
OpenStudy (anonymous):
\[\forall{x}\in\Bbb{R},x\ge0\]
OpenStudy (anonymous):
does that not say "for all real x , x must be greater than zero ?
Join the QuestionCove community and study together with friends!
Sign Up
OpenStudy (anonymous):
By itself, maybe, but it's not meant to stand alone.
OpenStudy (anonymous):
so this makes sense?
\[\forall x, x>0 \text{ }\exists y \in R, y >0 : y^2 = x\]
OpenStudy (anonymous):
i havent done much of this stuff, started the other day
OpenStudy (anonymous):
\[\forall{x}\in\{x\mid x\in\Bbb{R}\land x\ge0\}\]... maybe?
OpenStudy (anonymous):
i like that
Join the QuestionCove community and study together with friends!
Sign Up
OpenStudy (anonymous):
thanks
OpenStudy (anonymous):
hey schmeig.... :)
how 'bout this:
"I am disinclined to acquise to your request. I lack the capacity to..."
OpenStudy (anonymous):
hehe