I need help. What biconditional is NOT a good definition? o A whole number is odd if and only if the number is not divisible by 2. o An angle is straight if and only if its measure is 180 degrees. o A whole number is even if and only if it is divisible by 2. o A ray is a bisector of an angle if and only if it splits the angle into two angles.
hint: it's the choice that is not specific enough does that help?
I would think "A whole number is even if and only if it is divisible by 2." What makes a biconditional a good definition exactly? I forgot.
it's a good definition if the definition is complete
and also if you cannot think of a counterexample
Okay, I understand that part. One moment please.
sure
I'm not sure..
I think it might be the last choice; "A ray is a bisector of an angle if and only if it splits the angle into two angles."
What do you think?
I believe that the other three options are true.
actually you're right. because the last option is not complete
Thank you. :) Would you mind helping me with another problem real quick?
sure
by the way...the *complete* definition of angle bisector is a line that splits an angle into two EQUAL angles
Use the Law of Detachment to draw a conclusion from the two given statements. If I miss a basketball practice, then I cannot play in the upcoming game. I cannot play in the upcoming game. o I missed basketball practice. o I did not miss the basketball practice. o If I miss the upcoming game, then I missed practice. o Not possible
I think it is the first choice.
Oh okay, thank you for letting me know that.
Law of detachment truth value is P Q LoD T T T T F F F T T F F T now...if you put Q first... Q P LoD T T T F T T T F F F F T so in your statement, Q is already true. Therefore, only way for it to be true is if P is true. therefore you're right.
What does LoD stand for?
law of detachment
Okay
Thanks again!
welcome
Thank you for the medal as well. :)
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!