Ask your own question, for FREE!
Meta-math 13 Online
Parth (parthkohli):

I discovered an obvious thing some days back, but is there a solid proof for it? Prove that there are \(\rm x + 1\) faces if the base of a pyramid has \(\rm x\) sides. I know the concept of it, but just need to know if there's a proof.

OpenStudy (lgbasallote):

there is.

Parth (parthkohli):

Please.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

You mean for pyramids?

OpenStudy (ujjwal):

The base of a cube has 4 sides but it has 4+2 faces.. I didn't get it!

Parth (parthkohli):

Oops, yes, pyramids.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

It seems pretty obvious. There is one face attached to each of the base polygon's sides, plus the base itself.

Parth (parthkohli):

Yeah... but I am asking for a solid proof.

OpenStudy (ujjwal):

@ParthKohli needs a proof involving serious 'mathematics'

OpenStudy (anonymous):

For a pentagonal prism: |dw:1350485379807:dw|

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Pfft, drawing pictures is serious enough for me.

Parth (parthkohli):

Oh Lord, a solid proof.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

LOL, I get it.

Parth (parthkohli):

Induction?

OpenStudy (ujjwal):

Well, @CliffSedge , your diagram says it all...

Parth (parthkohli):

I need serious mathematics, sire, serious mathematics.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Euler's formula might come into play if you want to get all fancy about it. V-E+F=2

OpenStudy (lgbasallote):

to prove something, you need an equation

OpenStudy (ujjwal):

And that formula is valid also for a cube!!

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Euler's formula is valid for all polyhedra, so it will be applicable to the special case of pyramids. Here F=x+1

OpenStudy (anonymous):

The number of vertices, V, also equals x+1 (x for the vertices of the base polygon, plus the top vertex of the pyramid).

OpenStudy (anonymous):

And the number of edges, E = 2x (x for each side of the base polygon, plus the x edges coming up from its x vertices). These are all based on definitions of pyramids, so V-E+F=2 F=x+1 V=x+1 E=2x (x+1)-2x+(x+1)=2 Simplify and identity is verified.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Or since your task is to show that F=x+1, start with (x+1)-2x+F=2, and solve for F. This all seems quite circular, since it is merely restating definitions of pyramids.

Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!
Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!