Think about the recording you listened to before you started this exam. What can you safely determine about the broadcaster? A transcript of the broadcast is provided below.
"I'm broadcasting live from the Central Zoo in downtown, where zookeepers have just opened up two new habitats: one for kangaroos, and one for three-toed sloths. As we pass the kangaroo habitat," (coughs) "you can't smell this, ladies and gentlemen, but" (begins to speak as if holding nose) "perhaps you can tell from the way I am talking. There is a pungent odor that comes from the animals here. Each one of the three kangaroos has stopped and turned to stare at me as I stare back at them. There is a snarl on one's face. It is true that some kangaroos can be quite dangerous. Thankfully, there are thick bars separating me from them right now. I'll move over, then, to the three-toed sloth habitat." (unplugs nose) "Now, this is a nice, shaded area filled with trees and other plant life. Quite a difference in terrain from what we saw over at the foul-smelling kangaroo habitat. Here the three-toed sloths dangle lazily from their perches. One just blinked at me as if to say hello. This looks like the life. They are relaxing creatures to look at."
He is not prejudiced in any way. He is impartial, but not objective. He is completely objective. He is prejudiced against kangaroos.
@Spectrum @sani10
@jasonxx
the last one ...notice him hold his nose and talk about how snarling they are but releases his nose at the sloths cage and compliments them ..
can u help me with more journalim please ?
journalism...fun lol
i just tagged u in my new question
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!