Question

The United States invaded Iraq in 1991 and 2003. What was different about these invasions?

In 1991 the goal was to end the takeover of Kuwait, while in 2003 it was to actually remove Hussein from power.

The first invasion was a response to human rights and the other to find weapons of mass destruction.

In 1991 the goal was to prevent ethnic cleansing, and in 2003 it was to find Osama bin Laden.

The first invasion was unsuccessful, but the second destroyed support for terror there.

Answer 1

@FirstFrostByte @Hail

Answer 2

It could be A or B.
Because:
The 2003 Invasion of Iraq (19 March – 1 May 2003), was the start of the conflict known as the Iraq War, or Operation Iraqi Freedom, in which a combined force of troops from the United States, the United Kingdom, Australia and Poland invaded Iraq and toppled the regime of Saddam Hussein in 21 days of major combat operations.

Answer 3

Most likely A.

Answer 4

I'm thinking it is A. The main rationale for the 2003 invasion of Iraq was to remove Hussein from power, the weapons of mass destructions were not proven to exist (and didn't)

Answer 5

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rationale_for_the_Iraq_War

Answer 6

Thanks a lot!
(:

Answer 7

A In 1991 the goal was to end the takeover of Kuwait, while in 2003 it was to actually remove Hussein from power. Is correct.