Ask your own question, for FREE!
Mathematics 8 Online
OpenStudy (sburchette):

Predicate Logic/Calculus

OpenStudy (sburchette):

I'm trying to find a model (universe, definition of predicates) where the following is satisfiable but not true. \[\exists y A(x,y) \rightarrow \forall x \exists y A(x,y)\] I know that the free variable x occurs in the first part of the implication. To show that it is not true for all x, I simply quantify x with the universal quantifer and to show it is satisfiable, I quantify x with the existential quantifier. I'm having trouble beyond those steps.

OpenStudy (unklerhaukus):

*

Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!
Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!