Continental drift and plate tectonics are both theories but only plate tectonics is accepted as fact by the scientific community. Explain why plate tectonics is considered a scientific fact and why continental drift is not.
@jim_thompson5910 do you think you could help me out on this one..?
thanks @Dean.Shyy :)
Wegener proposed the continental drift theory, and provided scientific evidences for such, but couldn't explain the mechanism or processes behind the movement of continents. It wasn't until the mid-twentieth century with the discovery of the Mid-Atlantic Ridge that the processes causing plate movements began to be understood and led to the science of plate tectonics.
Also, you can experience the working of plate tectonics as it causes earthquakes and vulcano eruptions but continental drift is way more slower
is that along the same lines..?
oceans are on top of tectonic plates so the continents arent drifting over the ocean bed
There is a geography section for questions like this by the way :P
right. thats why the theory of continental drift would be not accepted by the scientific theory.. right? or do i have it all wrong..?
I think the problem is that the continents are not equal to the plates. One continent could be on different plates. when the plates move a continent gets cut in 2 and then for example 2 cracked continents smash against each other to form a new continent. So the continent did not move, the plates did.
I guess something like that :)
okay great! thanks a bunch for all of your help!
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!