All fruits have seeds. No vegetables have seeds. Therefore, botanically speaking, tomatoes, pumpkins, cucumbers, and zucchini are technically fruit not vegetables. Is this inductive or deductive reasoning?
You're missing a line that says "tomatoes, pumpkins, cucumbers, and zucchini have seeds" if you had that line, then you would be using deductive reasoning
deductive reasoning is starting with known true statements and building arguments and other facts from that
inductive reasoning is using known facts to try to generalize some relationship that applies universally
ex of inductive reasoning I pick up a rock and I test its hardness. I find the first rock is hard. I do the same for a second rock, and it's also hard. The same can be said about a third rock. So by inductive reasoning, EVERY rock is hard.
So you can see there's a bit of a flaw with this reasoning
Sorry that, must have been cut off when I copied it from my other page. Would it be deductive then?
yes it would be
Thank you very much!
you're welcome
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!