Mathematics
9 Online
OpenStudy (highschoolmom2010):
alternate interior angles theorem
Join the QuestionCove community and study together with friends!
Sign Up
OpenStudy (highschoolmom2010):
ganeshie8 (ganeshie8):
do u knw how to recognize corresponding angles ?
OpenStudy (highschoolmom2010):
im not really good at it... but kinda
ganeshie8 (ganeshie8):
ha, \(\angle 2 \) and \(\angle 6\) are corresponding angles. convince urself this first
OpenStudy (highschoolmom2010):
yea so <1 &<5 are corresponding
Join the QuestionCove community and study together with friends!
Sign Up
ganeshie8 (ganeshie8):
yea! you're brilliant :)
ganeshie8 (ganeshie8):
when lines are parallel, then corresponding angles are congruent.
ganeshie8 (ganeshie8):
2. \(\angle 2 \cong \angle 6\) 2. By Corresponding Angles postulate
ganeshie8 (ganeshie8):
Does that make sense
OpenStudy (highschoolmom2010):
yea that makes sense
Join the QuestionCove community and study together with friends!
Sign Up
ganeshie8 (ganeshie8):
Next, are you familiar wid "Vertical angles" ?
OpenStudy (highschoolmom2010):
the ones that go up and down on a line
ganeshie8 (ganeshie8):
|dw:1371489856641:dw|
ganeshie8 (ganeshie8):
when two lines cut, vertical angles are formed.
ganeshie8 (ganeshie8):
|dw:1371489911430:dw|
Join the QuestionCove community and study together with friends!
Sign Up
ganeshie8 (ganeshie8):
those two are vertical angles, they are congruent.
ganeshie8 (ganeshie8):
Vertical angles are always congruent.
OpenStudy (highschoolmom2010):
alright i understand that
ganeshie8 (ganeshie8):
3. \(\angle 4 \cong \angle 2\) 3. Vertical angles are congruent
OpenStudy (highschoolmom2010):
i see
Join the QuestionCove community and study together with friends!
Sign Up
OpenStudy (highschoolmom2010):
so how do i prove <4 & <6 are congruent
ganeshie8 (ganeshie8):
last one is bit easy, i want u think and figure out
ganeshie8 (ganeshie8):
give it a try
OpenStudy (highschoolmom2010):
alternate interior angles are congruent
ganeshie8 (ganeshie8):
nope. thats what u need to prove. u cant use wat u proving as a reason lol
Join the QuestionCove community and study together with friends!
Sign Up
OpenStudy (highschoolmom2010):
lol it was worth a shot so nope i have no idea
ganeshie8 (ganeshie8):
ha
ganeshie8 (ganeshie8):
look at 2, 3 statements. stare at them.
ganeshie8 (ganeshie8):
statement 3 says : \(\angle 4 \cong \angle 2\)
statement 2 says : \(\angle 2 \cong \angle 6\)
ganeshie8 (ganeshie8):
we have this, if a=b, and b=c, then a = c, wat property is it ?
Join the QuestionCove community and study together with friends!
Sign Up
OpenStudy (highschoolmom2010):
they are the same
ganeshie8 (ganeshie8):
when u doing proofs, u shouldnt say "they are same" without saying "why they're same"
OpenStudy (highschoolmom2010):
symmetry
ganeshie8 (ganeshie8):
close, try again
ganeshie8 (ganeshie8):
if a=b, and b=c, then a = c, wat property is it ?
Join the QuestionCove community and study together with friends!
Sign Up
ganeshie8 (ganeshie8):
google.
OpenStudy (highschoolmom2010):
transitive lol sorry i was looking in my notes
ganeshie8 (ganeshie8):
Yes !
OpenStudy (highschoolmom2010):
hooray
ganeshie8 (ganeshie8):
good job :)
Join the QuestionCove community and study together with friends!
Sign Up
OpenStudy (highschoolmom2010):
ty @ganeshie8
ganeshie8 (ganeshie8):
np :D