Ask
your own question, for FREE!
MIT 6.002 Circuits and Electronics, Spring 2007
7 Online
In lecture 8 dealing with dependent sources and amplifiers, Prof. Agarwal showed that if the current controlled source has an equation of i=k/Vr, we can deduce Vr=(KR)^1/2. Assuming the values of K=R=1, we get Vr=1V. There is V in the ckt despite of no independent source since initially Vr is 0 and the moment I increases, Vr also increases and they balance out each other to 1V. Can the same derivation for Vr be applied if i=K*Vr(squared)? Will the logic work? Since we get Vr=1/KR, if K=R=1, Vr=1. But logically Vr is 0 indefinitely since no independent source is present. Which one is true?
Can't find your answer?
Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!
Latest Questions
heartlessprophet:
How do i get paid from work when im in job court ?
Aubree:
Guys, what does love feel like? I've been getting a tight chest and when I talk to him my heart rate hangs out around 100-120 beats per min, and when he doe
thereneelg:
ok... anyone have advice?? ...I did Choir all throughout Middle school and have ALWAYS been put in Soprano those three years.
kamariana:
The Byzantine Procopius is known for (5 points) reconquering much of the old Roma
chuckD:
hellp!!! what does it mean to describe a scientist as skeptical Why is sceptical
DoltonCarlee:
So like do y'all know anything about the first world war?
thehearken:
anyone know how to explain this so its easier for me to understand? b(1)=2, b(n)=
17 hours ago
0 Replies
0 Medals
19 hours ago
8 Replies
1 Medal
1 day ago
6 Replies
1 Medal
2 days ago
0 Replies
0 Medals
2 days ago
2 Replies
1 Medal
1 day ago
2 Replies
0 Medals
1 day ago
5 Replies
2 Medals