Ask your own question, for FREE!
Biology 21 Online
OpenStudy (anonymous):

What makes mitochondrial DNA useful as a molecular clock? It is only found in select organisms, making it easier to compare relationships between species that have it. A large portion of the DNA ring is not vital to structure or function, allowing it to accumulate neutral mutations. Its rate of mutation increases over time as organisms continue to evolve and differentiate from each other. A slow mutation rate makes it useful for determining evolutionary relationships between ancient species.

OpenStudy (kayne):

Hi @DarkFairyTale ! Welcome to OpenStudy. Refer to this paper for more pieces of information: [ http://www.pnas.org/content/76/4/1967.full.pdf ] Check out this pdf as well: http://ase.tufts.edu/chemistry/hhmi/documents/Protocols/Maternal%20Ancestry_Introduction_Reworked_Aug_25_2011.pdf Maybe they could help you out.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

This was actually very helpful, hmm.

OpenStudy (kayne):

Great then :)

OpenStudy (anonymous):

It's a lot of reading though. guess i have to get started.

OpenStudy (kayne):

It isn't really. Happy reading :)

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Lol thanks.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

So it's not, A slow mutation rate makes it useful for determining evolutionary relationships between ancient species.

OpenStudy (kayne):

Definitely isn't cause it has a faster mutation rate than nuclear DNA and the one thing which makes it interesting to determine evolutionary change and trace back ancestors is that it comes from the maternal cell only.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

I'm guessing it's not the second one, isn't that the purpose of mitochondria DNA?

OpenStudy (kayne):

You mean the second option is the purpose of mtDNA?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

but, doesn't it control the function and replication of other mt? then how come it says it's not vital?

OpenStudy (kayne):

Well, actually, personally.. I wouldn't go with the second option cause I don't think that it's right. Having a small genome size I don't think that it would have a part which wouldn't be vital for the mt. I would go with the third option by elimination. What do you think?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

that makes sense actually, wow your good at this. thanks :)

OpenStudy (kayne):

You're welcome @DarkFairyTale :)

OpenStudy (kayne):

By the way, the question asked you about the molecular clock, so, another point against the second option. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Molecular_clock

OpenStudy (anonymous):

your covering all bases lol thanks

Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!
Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!